RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    북한 대외경제중재법의 신속중재절차 도입에 따른 남북경협에의 온라인 분쟁 해결(ODR) 도입 검토 = The Possibility of Introducing Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) to Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation Following North Korea’s Adoption of Expedited Procedure in Its Foreign Economic Arbitration Act

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110166305

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The sustainability of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation depends on the establishment of a predictable and stable institutional framework for dispute resolution. In this context, North Korea’s 2024 abrogation of all inter-Korean economic cooperation agreements, coupled with its concurrent adoption of an ‘Expedited Procedure’ into its Foreign Economic Arbitration Act, signals a paradigm shift in the resolution of inter-Korean commercial disputes. This study aims to analyze the implications of this institutional evolution in North Korea for the potential introduction of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), an innovative mechanism that transcends spatial and temporal constraints.
    North Korea’s legal codification of ‘expediency’ as a core principle of dispute resolution provides both the logical rationale and the institutional foundation for introducing ODR, the most effective technological means to achieve this objective. To this end, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of North Korea’s Expedited Procedure against those of major international arbitration institutions. It further examines the utility of ODR in the current context, where North Korea’s domestic Foreign Economic Arbitration Act has become the de facto governing law for inter-Korean disputes following the annulment of bilateral agreements.
    Moreover, the study offers a detailed examination of the multifaceted constraints and prerequisite conditions for implementing ODR. These include the limitations of technological infrastructure, challenges related to the legal validity of digital evidence and the mutual enforcement of arbitral awards, as well as the profound deficit of political trust between the two Koreas. In conclusion, this research posits that North Korea’s adoption of the Expedited Procedure presents a critical juncture to advance the discourse on ODR as an infrastructure of trust for inter-Korean relations. Accordingly, it proposes a phased implementation strategy, including the utilization of third-country institutions and concrete technical and legal integration measures, as a viable path forward.
    번역하기

    The sustainability of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation depends on the establishment of a predictable and stable institutional framework for dispute resolution. In this context, North Korea’s 2024 abrogation of all inter-Korean economic cooperation ...

    The sustainability of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation depends on the establishment of a predictable and stable institutional framework for dispute resolution. In this context, North Korea’s 2024 abrogation of all inter-Korean economic cooperation agreements, coupled with its concurrent adoption of an ‘Expedited Procedure’ into its Foreign Economic Arbitration Act, signals a paradigm shift in the resolution of inter-Korean commercial disputes. This study aims to analyze the implications of this institutional evolution in North Korea for the potential introduction of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), an innovative mechanism that transcends spatial and temporal constraints.
    North Korea’s legal codification of ‘expediency’ as a core principle of dispute resolution provides both the logical rationale and the institutional foundation for introducing ODR, the most effective technological means to achieve this objective. To this end, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of North Korea’s Expedited Procedure against those of major international arbitration institutions. It further examines the utility of ODR in the current context, where North Korea’s domestic Foreign Economic Arbitration Act has become the de facto governing law for inter-Korean disputes following the annulment of bilateral agreements.
    Moreover, the study offers a detailed examination of the multifaceted constraints and prerequisite conditions for implementing ODR. These include the limitations of technological infrastructure, challenges related to the legal validity of digital evidence and the mutual enforcement of arbitral awards, as well as the profound deficit of political trust between the two Koreas. In conclusion, this research posits that North Korea’s adoption of the Expedited Procedure presents a critical juncture to advance the discourse on ODR as an infrastructure of trust for inter-Korean relations. Accordingly, it proposes a phased implementation strategy, including the utilization of third-country institutions and concrete technical and legal integration measures, as a viable path forward.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼