RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      芥川龍之介『西郷隆盛』論 = A study on Saigo Takamori by Akutagawa Ryunosuke

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110131850

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This work is a short story that belongs to the so-called historical work of Ryunosuke Akutagawa, which was published in “Sin syousetu” in January of Taisho 7. Akutagawa wrote many works covering history, but most of his historical works did not follow historical facts, but simply based on historical facts and wrote themes.In other words, history was just a way to make use of his theme. For Akutagawa, history was used as a tool for “avoidance of unnatural obstacles” in novels. However, in this work, through Saigo Takamori, his own ideas on the history of the author Akutagawa itself are written. The story is about Honma, who met an old gentleman on the train on his way back to Kyoto for his graduation thesis, and it is a dispute over the Western-South War. The old gentleman said that there were many misrepresentations in the Western-South War, and among them, the biggest misrepresentation was the death of Saigo Takamori in the Battle of Siroyama. On the other hand, as a student studying history, Honma thought that Saigo Takamori's theory of survival was beyond consideration by using “all accurate historical materials.” An old gentleman expressed skepticism about history, saying, “There is no such thing as accurate historical material as it is enough to make a historical judgment.” Honma says that historical materials are reliable, but old gentlemen have many misrepresentations and many are unreliable.He said that history is written mainly on the side of winners or powerful people in history, so it is more likely that it will be written according to their convenience than the facts, so there are many “misrepresentations.” Akutagawa calls attention to the problems of historical distortion and historical window dressing, citing the fact that Saigo Takamori is unreliable and the inaccurate historical materials that inevitably arise from it.
      번역하기

      This work is a short story that belongs to the so-called historical work of Ryunosuke Akutagawa, which was published in “Sin syousetu” in January of Taisho 7. Akutagawa wrote many works covering history, but most of his historical works did not fo...

      This work is a short story that belongs to the so-called historical work of Ryunosuke Akutagawa, which was published in “Sin syousetu” in January of Taisho 7. Akutagawa wrote many works covering history, but most of his historical works did not follow historical facts, but simply based on historical facts and wrote themes.In other words, history was just a way to make use of his theme. For Akutagawa, history was used as a tool for “avoidance of unnatural obstacles” in novels. However, in this work, through Saigo Takamori, his own ideas on the history of the author Akutagawa itself are written. The story is about Honma, who met an old gentleman on the train on his way back to Kyoto for his graduation thesis, and it is a dispute over the Western-South War. The old gentleman said that there were many misrepresentations in the Western-South War, and among them, the biggest misrepresentation was the death of Saigo Takamori in the Battle of Siroyama. On the other hand, as a student studying history, Honma thought that Saigo Takamori's theory of survival was beyond consideration by using “all accurate historical materials.” An old gentleman expressed skepticism about history, saying, “There is no such thing as accurate historical material as it is enough to make a historical judgment.” Honma says that historical materials are reliable, but old gentlemen have many misrepresentations and many are unreliable.He said that history is written mainly on the side of winners or powerful people in history, so it is more likely that it will be written according to their convenience than the facts, so there are many “misrepresentations.” Akutagawa calls attention to the problems of historical distortion and historical window dressing, citing the fact that Saigo Takamori is unreliable and the inaccurate historical materials that inevitably arise from it.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼