RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국제해상운송에서 화물반출의 불법행위와 개선방안에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Tort of Cargo Release in International Sea Transportation and Improvement Schemes

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110121409

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study analyzes recent case law (Supreme Court Decision 2024Da270860) concerning the customary delivery of cargo by freight forwarders, terminal operators, and bonded warehouse operators without payment. It aims to clarify the legal status and tort liability of parties involved in the final stage of cargo delivery and seeks improvement schemes to prevent unauthorized cargo release.
      The analysis of the case law reveals that the court ruled the destination freight forwarder's act of providing a copy of the Master D/O without verifying the importer's payment as a tort, as it facilitated the unauthorized release of cargo. Notably, the court expanded the scope of liability regardless of whether bonded transportation was involved. This ruling confirms that the Master D/O is merely an internal delivery instruction between the carrier and the freight forwarder, whereas the legitimate authority for delivery to the importer lies with the House D/O.
      Based on these findings, this study proposes the following improvement schemes to eradicate torts related to cargo release. First, relevant parties must execute cargo release based on the principle of verifying payment and document surrender rather than relying on custom; in particular, the freight forwarder must fulfill its role as the central entity responsible for payment verification. Second, the system-based release approval process should be strengthened by adding functions to current electronic logistics systems, such as COPINO, that cross-verify payment information and the surrender of the House D/O. Third, legislation regarding the Delivery Order (D/O) is necessary to clarify its legal nature, which currently relies heavily on practical customs and case law.
      번역하기

      This study analyzes recent case law (Supreme Court Decision 2024Da270860) concerning the customary delivery of cargo by freight forwarders, terminal operators, and bonded warehouse operators without payment. It aims to clarify the legal status and tor...

      This study analyzes recent case law (Supreme Court Decision 2024Da270860) concerning the customary delivery of cargo by freight forwarders, terminal operators, and bonded warehouse operators without payment. It aims to clarify the legal status and tort liability of parties involved in the final stage of cargo delivery and seeks improvement schemes to prevent unauthorized cargo release.
      The analysis of the case law reveals that the court ruled the destination freight forwarder's act of providing a copy of the Master D/O without verifying the importer's payment as a tort, as it facilitated the unauthorized release of cargo. Notably, the court expanded the scope of liability regardless of whether bonded transportation was involved. This ruling confirms that the Master D/O is merely an internal delivery instruction between the carrier and the freight forwarder, whereas the legitimate authority for delivery to the importer lies with the House D/O.
      Based on these findings, this study proposes the following improvement schemes to eradicate torts related to cargo release. First, relevant parties must execute cargo release based on the principle of verifying payment and document surrender rather than relying on custom; in particular, the freight forwarder must fulfill its role as the central entity responsible for payment verification. Second, the system-based release approval process should be strengthened by adding functions to current electronic logistics systems, such as COPINO, that cross-verify payment information and the surrender of the House D/O. Third, legislation regarding the Delivery Order (D/O) is necessary to clarify its legal nature, which currently relies heavily on practical customs and case law.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼