RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The International Status of Generative Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110109740

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study conducts a comparative analysis of generative AI governance across 35 leading universities in seven countries, revealing a growing global convergence around core ethical principles and governance priorities. Drawing on UNESCO’s Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Education and Research (2023), the research identifies ten key governance dimensions—spanning transparency, fairness, human agency, safety and security, AI literacy, academic integrity, accountability, procurement and compliance, privacy and data protection, and intellectual property rights. Among these, five—fairness, human agency, academic integrity, data protection, and intellectual property—exhibit the highest degree of cross-national alignment. Despite contextual differences, institutions worldwide emphasize critical appraisal of AI outputs, the safeguarding of human autonomy, and the protection of data and creative authorship. Implementation pathways vary by region: East Asian universities emphasize responsible use under state-led regulatory environments; Anglo-American universities rely on flexible, practitioner-led institutional policies and guidelines; and Continental European universities adopt legally codified approaches grounded in regional regulations such as the GDPR and the EU AI Act. These patterns reflect a shared commitment to human-centered, transparent, and accountable governance of generative AI in higher education, while allowing for contextual diversity in regulatory and policy practice.
      번역하기

      This study conducts a comparative analysis of generative AI governance across 35 leading universities in seven countries, revealing a growing global convergence around core ethical principles and governance priorities. Drawing on UNESCO’s Guidelines...

      This study conducts a comparative analysis of generative AI governance across 35 leading universities in seven countries, revealing a growing global convergence around core ethical principles and governance priorities. Drawing on UNESCO’s Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI in Education and Research (2023), the research identifies ten key governance dimensions—spanning transparency, fairness, human agency, safety and security, AI literacy, academic integrity, accountability, procurement and compliance, privacy and data protection, and intellectual property rights. Among these, five—fairness, human agency, academic integrity, data protection, and intellectual property—exhibit the highest degree of cross-national alignment. Despite contextual differences, institutions worldwide emphasize critical appraisal of AI outputs, the safeguarding of human autonomy, and the protection of data and creative authorship. Implementation pathways vary by region: East Asian universities emphasize responsible use under state-led regulatory environments; Anglo-American universities rely on flexible, practitioner-led institutional policies and guidelines; and Continental European universities adopt legally codified approaches grounded in regional regulations such as the GDPR and the EU AI Act. These patterns reflect a shared commitment to human-centered, transparent, and accountable governance of generative AI in higher education, while allowing for contextual diversity in regulatory and policy practice.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼