RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      유지-이완 기법을 결합한 도수림프배액 중재가 유방암 환자의 림프부종 및 팔의 기능에 미치는 영향-예비 연구- = Effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Intervention Combined with Hold-Relax Technique on Lymphedema and Arm Function in Patients with Breast Cancer -A Preliminary Study-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110100724

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of a manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) intervention combined with thehold-relax (HR) technique with those of an MLD intervention alone on lymphedema and arm function in patients with breastcancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).
      Methods: The study participants were diagnosed with stage two lymphedema in one arm after undergoing treatment for breastcancer. They were diagnosed by a medical specialist and volunteered to participate in the study. A total of 14 subjects were randomlyassigned to seven experimental and seven control groups. The experimental group received MLD combined with the hold-relaxtechnique, while the control group received only MLD. The experimental group received 40 minutes of MLD and 20 minutesof HR, while the control group received only MLD for 60 minutes. All interventions were performed once or twice a week fora total of four weeks. The volume of lymphedema and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were measuredbefore and 4 weeks after the intervention in both groups.
      Results: The lymphedema volume (effect size = 1.81) and DASH score (effect size = 0.54) decreased significantly in theexperimental group after the intervention compared with before (p < 0.05). Additionally, the change in lymphedema volume was significantly greater in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05).
      Conclusion: A four-week MLD intervention combined with HR was more effective than an MLD intervention alonein reducing lymphedema volume and improving arm function. For patients with BCRL, a combination of MLD andother interventions, rather than MLD alone, is recommended to improve lymphedema and arm function.
      번역하기

      Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of a manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) intervention combined with thehold-relax (HR) technique with those of an MLD intervention alone on lymphedema and arm function in patients with breastcancer-related ...

      Purpose: This study aimed to compare the effects of a manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) intervention combined with thehold-relax (HR) technique with those of an MLD intervention alone on lymphedema and arm function in patients with breastcancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).
      Methods: The study participants were diagnosed with stage two lymphedema in one arm after undergoing treatment for breastcancer. They were diagnosed by a medical specialist and volunteered to participate in the study. A total of 14 subjects were randomlyassigned to seven experimental and seven control groups. The experimental group received MLD combined with the hold-relaxtechnique, while the control group received only MLD. The experimental group received 40 minutes of MLD and 20 minutesof HR, while the control group received only MLD for 60 minutes. All interventions were performed once or twice a week fora total of four weeks. The volume of lymphedema and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score were measuredbefore and 4 weeks after the intervention in both groups.
      Results: The lymphedema volume (effect size = 1.81) and DASH score (effect size = 0.54) decreased significantly in theexperimental group after the intervention compared with before (p < 0.05). Additionally, the change in lymphedema volume was significantly greater in the experimental group than in the control group (p<0.05).
      Conclusion: A four-week MLD intervention combined with HR was more effective than an MLD intervention alonein reducing lymphedema volume and improving arm function. For patients with BCRL, a combination of MLD andother interventions, rather than MLD alone, is recommended to improve lymphedema and arm function.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼