RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      텍스트 분석 기법을 활용한 국내 예술 정책 보고서 동향 연구 = Analyzing Trends in Korean Arts Policy Reports Using Text Analysis Methods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110100319

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This limitations study quantitatively examining the macro-structure and chronological changes in policy discourse. We applied TF-IDF weighting and LDA Topic Modeling to a corpus of 39 arts-related policy reports published between 2000 and 2024 by national research institutions under the National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences (NRC, 경사연).
      The TF-IDF analysis confirmed that the arts policy agenda is multidisciplinary, spanning 13 disparate policy domains including education, legislation, and economy. Key terms such as ‘cooperation,’ ‘exchange,’ ‘fusion,’ ‘regulation,’ and ‘copyright’ demonstrated that the instrumental values of arts have been central issues over the long term, aligning with the trend of instrumental cultural policies linking arts to social structures like the technological development.
      advancement LDA Topic Modeling, which yielded an optimal structure of four topics, revealed that Korean arts policy discourse is structured around four distinct axes: Law and Digital Rights, Social Welfare and Regulation, Youth and Regional Development, and Inter-Korean Cultural Exchange. The time-series analysis further demonstrated that policy priorities have historically oscillated between two major driving forces: Geopolitical Specificity, seen in early 2000s concentration on inter-Korean cultural exchange, and Technological Innovation, seen in the prominence of digital rights and legal issues from the 2010s onward.
      Our quantitative analysis provides objective, evidence-based insights into the structural evolution of Korean arts policy. It offers critical implications, emphasizing the urgent need for continuous research on the institutional framework for art-tech relationship.
      the establishment of permanent inter-ministerial cooperative governance to address complex policy demands, and the adoption of data science methods to build an evidence-based policy system for future-oriented arts policy making.
      번역하기

      This limitations study quantitatively examining the macro-structure and chronological changes in policy discourse. We applied TF-IDF weighting and LDA Topic Modeling to a corpus of 39 arts-related policy reports published between 2000 and 2024 by nati...

      This limitations study quantitatively examining the macro-structure and chronological changes in policy discourse. We applied TF-IDF weighting and LDA Topic Modeling to a corpus of 39 arts-related policy reports published between 2000 and 2024 by national research institutions under the National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences (NRC, 경사연).
      The TF-IDF analysis confirmed that the arts policy agenda is multidisciplinary, spanning 13 disparate policy domains including education, legislation, and economy. Key terms such as ‘cooperation,’ ‘exchange,’ ‘fusion,’ ‘regulation,’ and ‘copyright’ demonstrated that the instrumental values of arts have been central issues over the long term, aligning with the trend of instrumental cultural policies linking arts to social structures like the technological development.
      advancement LDA Topic Modeling, which yielded an optimal structure of four topics, revealed that Korean arts policy discourse is structured around four distinct axes: Law and Digital Rights, Social Welfare and Regulation, Youth and Regional Development, and Inter-Korean Cultural Exchange. The time-series analysis further demonstrated that policy priorities have historically oscillated between two major driving forces: Geopolitical Specificity, seen in early 2000s concentration on inter-Korean cultural exchange, and Technological Innovation, seen in the prominence of digital rights and legal issues from the 2010s onward.
      Our quantitative analysis provides objective, evidence-based insights into the structural evolution of Korean arts policy. It offers critical implications, emphasizing the urgent need for continuous research on the institutional framework for art-tech relationship.
      the establishment of permanent inter-ministerial cooperative governance to address complex policy demands, and the adoption of data science methods to build an evidence-based policy system for future-oriented arts policy making.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼