This study aims to analyze the ethical risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) across key domains of secondary education—including curriculum, instruction, assessment, student guidance, classroom management, and school governance —and ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110098350
2025
Korean
AI ; AI 윤리 ; AI 교육 ; AI 윤리교육 ; 디지털 교육 ; AI ; AI Ethics ; AI Education ; AI Ethics Education ; Digital Education
KCI등재
학술저널
189-220(32쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study aims to analyze the ethical risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) across key domains of secondary education—including curriculum, instruction, assessment, student guidance, classroom management, and school governance —and ...
This study aims to analyze the ethical risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) across key domains of secondary education—including curriculum, instruction, assessment, student guidance, classroom management, and school governance —and to propose corresponding policy and pedagogical measures. Recent cases of generative AI–assisted academic misconduct in universities illustrate the potential collapse of academic integrity and assessment fairness, and similar risks are rapidly emerging in secondary schools through AI-generated plagiarism and ghostwriting. Major ethical issues identified in this study include weakened curricular publicness due to algorithmic bias and platform dependency; compromised instructional reliability resulting from generative AI errors and hallucinations; diminished assessment fairness caused by opaque and biased AI scoring; misjudgment and stigmatization risks in student guidance and classroom management; and responsibility gaps and weakened data sovereignty within school governance.
Corresponding tasks include establishing AI bias-verification mechanisms and protecting teachers’ curricular authority, mandating critical AI literacy education in classrooms, enforcing academic-integrity safeguards and teacher final-approval systems in assessment, restricting AI to low-risk support functions and strengthening protections for sensitive student data in guidance, implementing teacher oversight and error-correction structures in classroom management, and adopting explicit consent procedures, accountability frameworks, and enhanced teacher competencies in AI ethics at the governance level. This study demonstrates that AI ethics must be understood not merely as technical usage guidelines but as an essential institutional framework for ensuring fairness, responsibility, and the protection of student rights.
청소년이 지각한 아동기 부정적 경험(ACE)이 학교생활 부적응에 미치는 영향: 사회적 지지의 조절효과
브레인트레이닝의 효과와 활용 가능성 : 초고령사회 뇌건강 관리를 중심으로