RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중등교육에서의 AI 윤리 쟁점과 과제 = Issues and Challenges of AI Ethics in Secondary Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110098350

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to analyze the ethical risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) across key domains of secondary education—including curriculum, instruction, assessment, student guidance, classroom management, and school governance —and to propose corresponding policy and pedagogical measures. Recent cases of generative AI–assisted academic misconduct in universities illustrate the potential collapse of academic integrity and assessment fairness, and similar risks are rapidly emerging in secondary schools through AI-generated plagiarism and ghostwriting. Major ethical issues identified in this study include weakened curricular publicness due to algorithmic bias and platform dependency; compromised instructional reliability resulting from generative AI errors and hallucinations; diminished assessment fairness caused by opaque and biased AI scoring; misjudgment and stigmatization risks in student guidance and classroom management; and responsibility gaps and weakened data sovereignty within school governance.
      Corresponding tasks include establishing AI bias-verification mechanisms and protecting teachers’ curricular authority, mandating critical AI literacy education in classrooms, enforcing academic-integrity safeguards and teacher final-approval systems in assessment, restricting AI to low-risk support functions and strengthening protections for sensitive student data in guidance, implementing teacher oversight and error-correction structures in classroom management, and adopting explicit consent procedures, accountability frameworks, and enhanced teacher competencies in AI ethics at the governance level. This study demonstrates that AI ethics must be understood not merely as technical usage guidelines but as an essential institutional framework for ensuring fairness, responsibility, and the protection of student rights.
      번역하기

      This study aims to analyze the ethical risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) across key domains of secondary education—including curriculum, instruction, assessment, student guidance, classroom management, and school governance —and ...

      This study aims to analyze the ethical risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) across key domains of secondary education—including curriculum, instruction, assessment, student guidance, classroom management, and school governance —and to propose corresponding policy and pedagogical measures. Recent cases of generative AI–assisted academic misconduct in universities illustrate the potential collapse of academic integrity and assessment fairness, and similar risks are rapidly emerging in secondary schools through AI-generated plagiarism and ghostwriting. Major ethical issues identified in this study include weakened curricular publicness due to algorithmic bias and platform dependency; compromised instructional reliability resulting from generative AI errors and hallucinations; diminished assessment fairness caused by opaque and biased AI scoring; misjudgment and stigmatization risks in student guidance and classroom management; and responsibility gaps and weakened data sovereignty within school governance.
      Corresponding tasks include establishing AI bias-verification mechanisms and protecting teachers’ curricular authority, mandating critical AI literacy education in classrooms, enforcing academic-integrity safeguards and teacher final-approval systems in assessment, restricting AI to low-risk support functions and strengthening protections for sensitive student data in guidance, implementing teacher oversight and error-correction structures in classroom management, and adopting explicit consent procedures, accountability frameworks, and enhanced teacher competencies in AI ethics at the governance level. This study demonstrates that AI ethics must be understood not merely as technical usage guidelines but as an essential institutional framework for ensuring fairness, responsibility, and the protection of student rights.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼