RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      AI–Human Hybrid 기반 공공디자인·경관 통합심의 운영체계 설계 연구 = AI–Human Hybrid Framework for Designing an Integrated Public Design and Landscape Review System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110093977

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines the feasibility of an AI–Human Hybrid integrated deliberation system to address structural limitations in landscape and public design reviews conducted by local governments. These limitations include duplicated procedures, unclear standards, inconsistent judgments, and limited citizen perspectives. Guided by the Landscape Act and the Public Design Promotion Act, the study analyzes current deliberation practices. The methodology integrates literature and legal analysis, institutional comparison, and expert FGIs. The findings reveal persistent inefficiencies and judgment variability, while expert FGIs highlight both the value of AI—quantitative analysis, case-based evidence, predictive support—and its limitations in cultural judgment, accountability, and potential bias. Experts agreed that AI should serve as a supportive tool with an involvement level of 20–30%. The study concludes that an AI–Human Hybrid model can enhance objectivity, efficiency, and transparency in integrated deliberations and underscores the need for region-specific AI-assisted models.
      번역하기

      This study examines the feasibility of an AI–Human Hybrid integrated deliberation system to address structural limitations in landscape and public design reviews conducted by local governments. These limitations include duplicated procedures, unclea...

      This study examines the feasibility of an AI–Human Hybrid integrated deliberation system to address structural limitations in landscape and public design reviews conducted by local governments. These limitations include duplicated procedures, unclear standards, inconsistent judgments, and limited citizen perspectives. Guided by the Landscape Act and the Public Design Promotion Act, the study analyzes current deliberation practices. The methodology integrates literature and legal analysis, institutional comparison, and expert FGIs. The findings reveal persistent inefficiencies and judgment variability, while expert FGIs highlight both the value of AI—quantitative analysis, case-based evidence, predictive support—and its limitations in cultural judgment, accountability, and potential bias. Experts agreed that AI should serve as a supportive tool with an involvement level of 20–30%. The study concludes that an AI–Human Hybrid model can enhance objectivity, efficiency, and transparency in integrated deliberations and underscores the need for region-specific AI-assisted models.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼