RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      임란 종전 직후 전전(戰前) 체제로의 복귀와 그 결과 = Restoration of the Prewar Order and Its Consequences after the Imjin War

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110093097

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study explores the political and social movement to restore the prewar order in the decade following the end of the Imjin War (1592-1598), up to the death of King Seonjo, and examines the popular resistance that arose in response. Through this inquiry, it highlights the fundamentally conservative character of Joseon and reveals how the postwar response― rather than military victory or defeat―ultimately determined the nation’s fate.
      Facing deep internal decay rooted in hereditary slavery, an oppressive tribute system, and pervasive corruption, Joseon entered the war already in crisis. To overcome the national catastrophe, reforms led by Ryu Seong-ryong sought to relax the rigid status system and implement the Law of Daedong, which standardized tribute payments in grain. These wartime measures dismantled barriers of privilege and inspired voluntary militia movements and widespread contributions from the populace. Having glimpsed the possibility of a fairer and more open society, ordinary people hoped that such reforms would continue after the war’s end.
      However, King Seonjo and the entrenched yangban elite regarded these policies as dangerous catalysts for social upheaval that threatened the Neo-Confucian hierarchical order. Despite the Ming emperor’s exhortations to undertake sweeping renewal, they rejected reform under the pretext of “allowing the people to rest.” Instead, they expelled Ryu Seong-ryong, nullified the wartime reforms, and reinstated the old stratified system. In the following decade, laws on emancipation and social mobility were repealed; proposals for tax and currency reform were shelved; and even the gongmyeongcheop― certificates of merit granted during the war―were confiscated and destroyed, a blatant breach of public trust.
      Meanwhile, royal princes such as Imhae-gun and Sunhwa-gun became infamous for violence and debauchery, and corrupt practices like bangnap (brokered tribute collection) and gungbang jeolsu (palace exploitation) reemerged, deepening public resentment. Disillusioned commoners turned toward Buddhism and organized mass gatherings such as the Manin Donggaphoe and Suryukhoe to express their frustration, leading officials to fear large-scale uprisings akin to the “White Lotus Rebellion.”
      By failing to seize the opportunity for national renewal through “jingbi” 懲毖, postwar Joseon entered a period marked by the erosion of public confidence, the decline of royal authority, and the weakening of military power―conditions that paved the way for King Gwanghae’s troubled reign and the later invasions by the Later Jin.
      번역하기

      This study explores the political and social movement to restore the prewar order in the decade following the end of the Imjin War (1592-1598), up to the death of King Seonjo, and examines the popular resistance that arose in response. Through this in...

      This study explores the political and social movement to restore the prewar order in the decade following the end of the Imjin War (1592-1598), up to the death of King Seonjo, and examines the popular resistance that arose in response. Through this inquiry, it highlights the fundamentally conservative character of Joseon and reveals how the postwar response― rather than military victory or defeat―ultimately determined the nation’s fate.
      Facing deep internal decay rooted in hereditary slavery, an oppressive tribute system, and pervasive corruption, Joseon entered the war already in crisis. To overcome the national catastrophe, reforms led by Ryu Seong-ryong sought to relax the rigid status system and implement the Law of Daedong, which standardized tribute payments in grain. These wartime measures dismantled barriers of privilege and inspired voluntary militia movements and widespread contributions from the populace. Having glimpsed the possibility of a fairer and more open society, ordinary people hoped that such reforms would continue after the war’s end.
      However, King Seonjo and the entrenched yangban elite regarded these policies as dangerous catalysts for social upheaval that threatened the Neo-Confucian hierarchical order. Despite the Ming emperor’s exhortations to undertake sweeping renewal, they rejected reform under the pretext of “allowing the people to rest.” Instead, they expelled Ryu Seong-ryong, nullified the wartime reforms, and reinstated the old stratified system. In the following decade, laws on emancipation and social mobility were repealed; proposals for tax and currency reform were shelved; and even the gongmyeongcheop― certificates of merit granted during the war―were confiscated and destroyed, a blatant breach of public trust.
      Meanwhile, royal princes such as Imhae-gun and Sunhwa-gun became infamous for violence and debauchery, and corrupt practices like bangnap (brokered tribute collection) and gungbang jeolsu (palace exploitation) reemerged, deepening public resentment. Disillusioned commoners turned toward Buddhism and organized mass gatherings such as the Manin Donggaphoe and Suryukhoe to express their frustration, leading officials to fear large-scale uprisings akin to the “White Lotus Rebellion.”
      By failing to seize the opportunity for national renewal through “jingbi” 懲毖, postwar Joseon entered a period marked by the erosion of public confidence, the decline of royal authority, and the weakening of military power―conditions that paved the way for King Gwanghae’s troubled reign and the later invasions by the Later Jin.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼