RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    5·18 기억의 감정정치 : 기억-공감구조의 메타분석 = The Emotional Politics of the May 18 Memory: A Meta-Content Analysis of Memory–Empathy Dynamics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110091561

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The May 18 Gwangju Democratization Movement constitutes a foundational element of Korea’s collective memory, functioning not only as a historical event but also as a site of emotional politics where affective processes and emotions intersect. Although previous research has examined the political meanings, cultural representations, and affective dimensions of May 18, systematic analyses of the mechanisms through which memory translates into empathy remain limited. To address this gap, this study conducts a meta-content analysis of 46 academic works published between 1990 and 2025. Using a memory–empathy coding framework, three dimensions of memory(memory centrality, meaning-making, and affective memory) and three dimensions of empathy(affective analysis, memory-to-empathy pathways, and empathy intensity) are quantitatively coded to examine their structural relationships. The findings reveal that memory centrality and meaning-making show no statistically significant association with empathy, whereas affective memory exerts strong and consistent effects across all dimensions of empathic response. Furthermore, the high correlations between empathy indicators and the Memory–Empathy Index(ME Index) suggest that scholarship on May 18 has increasingly shifted toward an affect-centered structure of emotional politics, in which affective memory plays a central role in shaping and expanding empathic engagement.
    번역하기

    The May 18 Gwangju Democratization Movement constitutes a foundational element of Korea’s collective memory, functioning not only as a historical event but also as a site of emotional politics where affective processes and emotions intersect. Althou...

    The May 18 Gwangju Democratization Movement constitutes a foundational element of Korea’s collective memory, functioning not only as a historical event but also as a site of emotional politics where affective processes and emotions intersect. Although previous research has examined the political meanings, cultural representations, and affective dimensions of May 18, systematic analyses of the mechanisms through which memory translates into empathy remain limited. To address this gap, this study conducts a meta-content analysis of 46 academic works published between 1990 and 2025. Using a memory–empathy coding framework, three dimensions of memory(memory centrality, meaning-making, and affective memory) and three dimensions of empathy(affective analysis, memory-to-empathy pathways, and empathy intensity) are quantitatively coded to examine their structural relationships. The findings reveal that memory centrality and meaning-making show no statistically significant association with empathy, whereas affective memory exerts strong and consistent effects across all dimensions of empathic response. Furthermore, the high correlations between empathy indicators and the Memory–Empathy Index(ME Index) suggest that scholarship on May 18 has increasingly shifted toward an affect-centered structure of emotional politics, in which affective memory plays a central role in shaping and expanding empathic engagement.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼