RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      경찰 드론의 법 제도에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Legal System for Police Drones

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As police activities shift from a personnel-centered approach to a technology-centered model, advancements in artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the Internet of Things have expanded the scope of crime into more intelligent, sophisticated, and concealed forms, reaching beyond physical reality into virtual spaces. Such changes in the security environment have increased the burden on the police in safeguarding the lives, bodies, and property of citizens, thereby heightening the need for active utilization of science and technology–based equipment such as drones. Although the Police Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operation Regulations, enacted in 2024, provide operational procedures and safety standards for police drones, the higher-level legal basis for drone operation has yet to be clearly established. In particular, it remains unclear whether drones fall under the category of “aircraft” as stipulated in Article 10(2) of the Police Officers’ Duties Execution Act. Moreover, the use of drones for search, surveillance, and investigative purposes potentially conflicts with the Personal Information Protection Act, Location Information Protection Act, and Criminal Procedure Act. Concerns over possible infringements of individual privacy arising from drone-based data collection also highlight the need for legal refinement. This study analyzes the legal issues emerging from the expanded use of police drones in a rapidly changing security environment and examines the need to improve relevant legal frameworks concerning personal information protection, location data usage, police authority in duty execution, and procedural legitimacy under criminal law. The study primarily employs a literature review method and acknowledges the limitation of not incorporating empirical or quantitative analysis.
      번역하기

      As police activities shift from a personnel-centered approach to a technology-centered model, advancements in artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the Internet of Things have expanded the scope of crime into more intelligent, sophisticated, and co...

      As police activities shift from a personnel-centered approach to a technology-centered model, advancements in artificial intelligence, blockchain, and the Internet of Things have expanded the scope of crime into more intelligent, sophisticated, and concealed forms, reaching beyond physical reality into virtual spaces. Such changes in the security environment have increased the burden on the police in safeguarding the lives, bodies, and property of citizens, thereby heightening the need for active utilization of science and technology–based equipment such as drones. Although the Police Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operation Regulations, enacted in 2024, provide operational procedures and safety standards for police drones, the higher-level legal basis for drone operation has yet to be clearly established. In particular, it remains unclear whether drones fall under the category of “aircraft” as stipulated in Article 10(2) of the Police Officers’ Duties Execution Act. Moreover, the use of drones for search, surveillance, and investigative purposes potentially conflicts with the Personal Information Protection Act, Location Information Protection Act, and Criminal Procedure Act. Concerns over possible infringements of individual privacy arising from drone-based data collection also highlight the need for legal refinement. This study analyzes the legal issues emerging from the expanded use of police drones in a rapidly changing security environment and examines the need to improve relevant legal frameworks concerning personal information protection, location data usage, police authority in duty execution, and procedural legitimacy under criminal law. The study primarily employs a literature review method and acknowledges the limitation of not incorporating empirical or quantitative analysis.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼