RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      특별수익과 기여분의 경계와 조정에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Boundary and Coordination between Special Benefit and Contribution Share in Inheritance Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110066617

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study critically examines the interpretative imbalance and legislative gaps revealed in the operation of the special benefit system under Korean inheritance law, and explores ways to achieve substantive equity among heirs through the coordinated functioning of the special benefit, contribution, and reserved portion systems.
      Article 1008 of the Korean Civil Code establishes the special benefit system as a core mechanism to secure fairness among co-heirs by treating lifetime gifts or bequests from the decedent as advances on inheritance shares. However, recent court decisions have interpreted such inter vivos gifts to spouses or descendants not as mere gratuitous transfers, but as settlements within the marital community or compensation for care and contribution. This interpretative tendency blurs the conceptual boundary between special benefit and contribution, thereby weakening their structural distinction.
      In particular, long-term and non-property contributions—such as the spouse’s care and support—have substantially contributed to maintaining the decedent’s estate and the family community, yet remain unrecognized under the current legal framework, which regards them merely as the fulfillment of legal duties. To overcome these limitations, this study argues that such non-property contributions should be evaluated not as special benefits but as contributions in the calculation of inheritance shares. It further emphasizes the need to ensure fairness in inheritance distribution through the structural coordination of the contribution and reserved portion systems.
      Finally, by analyzing the Constitutional Court’s decision of April 25, 2024 (2020Hun-Ga4), this study highlights the need to reflect contributions in the calculation of reserved portions and to reconstruct the inheritance system accordingly. Through this integrative approach, the study seeks to propose interpretative and legislative directions to realize familial justice and substantive equity within inheritance law.
      번역하기

      This study critically examines the interpretative imbalance and legislative gaps revealed in the operation of the special benefit system under Korean inheritance law, and explores ways to achieve substantive equity among heirs through the coordinated ...

      This study critically examines the interpretative imbalance and legislative gaps revealed in the operation of the special benefit system under Korean inheritance law, and explores ways to achieve substantive equity among heirs through the coordinated functioning of the special benefit, contribution, and reserved portion systems.
      Article 1008 of the Korean Civil Code establishes the special benefit system as a core mechanism to secure fairness among co-heirs by treating lifetime gifts or bequests from the decedent as advances on inheritance shares. However, recent court decisions have interpreted such inter vivos gifts to spouses or descendants not as mere gratuitous transfers, but as settlements within the marital community or compensation for care and contribution. This interpretative tendency blurs the conceptual boundary between special benefit and contribution, thereby weakening their structural distinction.
      In particular, long-term and non-property contributions—such as the spouse’s care and support—have substantially contributed to maintaining the decedent’s estate and the family community, yet remain unrecognized under the current legal framework, which regards them merely as the fulfillment of legal duties. To overcome these limitations, this study argues that such non-property contributions should be evaluated not as special benefits but as contributions in the calculation of inheritance shares. It further emphasizes the need to ensure fairness in inheritance distribution through the structural coordination of the contribution and reserved portion systems.
      Finally, by analyzing the Constitutional Court’s decision of April 25, 2024 (2020Hun-Ga4), this study highlights the need to reflect contributions in the calculation of reserved portions and to reconstruct the inheritance system accordingly. Through this integrative approach, the study seeks to propose interpretative and legislative directions to realize familial justice and substantive equity within inheritance law.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼