RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      압수수색 영장 집행 시 참여권에 대한 고찰 = A study on the right to proceed in the execution of search and seizure warrants

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110065311

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines the recent Supreme Court decisions regarding the principles of "specific identification of objects" and the expansion of participation rights for the person whose digital information is seized, as well as their legal counsel, during digital search and seizure procedures. Focusing on the boundaries set by criminal procedure law, the unique characteristics of digital evidence, and the expanded concept of eligible participants, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of procedural legitimacy. While recent judicial interpretations that grant participation rights to both the actual holder and their attorney represent significant progress in protecting defense rights and fundamental freedoms, this article also highlights the limitations of expanding procedural rights solely through case law without explicit legislative support. Moreover, it argues that merely broadening participation rights is insufficient to prevent abuse of digital searches, underscoring the need for institutional safeguards such as special enforcement officers and Furnishing a list of seized items. This research seeks to strike a balance between legislative improvement and the expansion of procedural guarantees, contributing to the development of lawful procedures and protection of fundamental rights in the era of digital criminal justice.
      번역하기

      This study examines the recent Supreme Court decisions regarding the principles of "specific identification of objects" and the expansion of participation rights for the person whose digital information is seized, as well as their legal counsel, durin...

      This study examines the recent Supreme Court decisions regarding the principles of "specific identification of objects" and the expansion of participation rights for the person whose digital information is seized, as well as their legal counsel, during digital search and seizure procedures. Focusing on the boundaries set by criminal procedure law, the unique characteristics of digital evidence, and the expanded concept of eligible participants, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of procedural legitimacy. While recent judicial interpretations that grant participation rights to both the actual holder and their attorney represent significant progress in protecting defense rights and fundamental freedoms, this article also highlights the limitations of expanding procedural rights solely through case law without explicit legislative support. Moreover, it argues that merely broadening participation rights is insufficient to prevent abuse of digital searches, underscoring the need for institutional safeguards such as special enforcement officers and Furnishing a list of seized items. This research seeks to strike a balance between legislative improvement and the expansion of procedural guarantees, contributing to the development of lawful procedures and protection of fundamental rights in the era of digital criminal justice.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼