RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Hospice and Palliative Care Response Policy During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in South Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110047046

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      South Korea received international acclaim for its rapid response to the initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis through the “K-Quarantine” model, successfully managing it without closing its borders; however, terminally ill patients awaiting death in 19 public hospice facilities (83.4%/297 beds) had to vacate their beds to accommodate patients with COVID-19. This study examines and analyzed South Korea’s hospice response policies during the pandemic. It draws on empirical data from domestic and international literature reviews and relevant websites. This study aimed to provide foundational data and policy recommendations for future pandemic preparedness. The findings revealed that, owing to the national response policy focused on infectious disease control and hospital bed allocation, 21 of the 88 inpatient hospice units in South Korea were closed, with their beds repurposed Therefore, hospice palliative care services became a “negotiable service” largely excluded from pandemic response policies. Strict visitation policies lowered hospice service utilization and disrupted service continuity. Emergency care support helped to mitigate care gaps; however, hospice care was limited in addressing patients’ specialized needs, demonstrating structural fragmentation within the health and welfare systems. In conclusion, South Korea’s hospice and palliative care response policy to the COVID-19 pandemic has failed to meet the essential goal of hospice palliative care: enhancing patient dignity and quality of life. To strengthen preparedness for future pandemics, designating specialized hospice institutions as essential health facilities, establishing infrastructure stabilization funds, developing a crisis-responsive payment systems, are essential.
      번역하기

      South Korea received international acclaim for its rapid response to the initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis through the “K-Quarantine” model, successfully managing it without closing its borders; however, terminally ill pa...

      South Korea received international acclaim for its rapid response to the initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic crisis through the “K-Quarantine” model, successfully managing it without closing its borders; however, terminally ill patients awaiting death in 19 public hospice facilities (83.4%/297 beds) had to vacate their beds to accommodate patients with COVID-19. This study examines and analyzed South Korea’s hospice response policies during the pandemic. It draws on empirical data from domestic and international literature reviews and relevant websites. This study aimed to provide foundational data and policy recommendations for future pandemic preparedness. The findings revealed that, owing to the national response policy focused on infectious disease control and hospital bed allocation, 21 of the 88 inpatient hospice units in South Korea were closed, with their beds repurposed Therefore, hospice palliative care services became a “negotiable service” largely excluded from pandemic response policies. Strict visitation policies lowered hospice service utilization and disrupted service continuity. Emergency care support helped to mitigate care gaps; however, hospice care was limited in addressing patients’ specialized needs, demonstrating structural fragmentation within the health and welfare systems. In conclusion, South Korea’s hospice and palliative care response policy to the COVID-19 pandemic has failed to meet the essential goal of hospice palliative care: enhancing patient dignity and quality of life. To strengthen preparedness for future pandemics, designating specialized hospice institutions as essential health facilities, establishing infrastructure stabilization funds, developing a crisis-responsive payment systems, are essential.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼