RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      클라우드 컴퓨팅 압수・수색의 법적 쟁점과 개선 방안 = Legal Issues and Reform of Search and Seizure in Cloud Computing

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109960975

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to comprehensively analyze the legal issues arising from search and seizure in cloud computing environments and to propose institutional reforms. Unlike traditional physical storage media, cloud data is characterized by distribution, virtualization, multi-user environments, and cross-border storage, which conflict with the existing concepts of “objects to be seized” and “places to be searched” under the Korean Criminal Procedure Act. This paper classifies cloud search and seizure into four types—physical seizure of servers, compelled reproduction and submission by service providers, remote search and seizure, and extraterritorial remote search and seizure—and examines the legal and practical challenges inherent in each type. Key issues include ensuring the authenticity and integrity of digital evidence, handling unrelated data (so-called “separate-case information”), guaranteeing the participation rights of data subjects, and addressing jurisdictional conflicts. Based on these analyses, the study proposes several reforms, including the introduction of a statutory system for compelled submission, explicit legal provisions for remote and extraterritorial searches, a data preservation order, filtering mechanisms to minimize intrusion into unrelated data, and strengthening the participation rights of actual data owners. Ultimately, cloud search and seizure has become an indispensable investigative method in the digital age; however, it requires balanced institutional safeguards that protect fundamental rights while ensuring effective fact-finding. This paper contributes to establishing a foundation for more rational and detailed procedures in digital evidence investigations.
      번역하기

      This study aims to comprehensively analyze the legal issues arising from search and seizure in cloud computing environments and to propose institutional reforms. Unlike traditional physical storage media, cloud data is characterized by distribution, v...

      This study aims to comprehensively analyze the legal issues arising from search and seizure in cloud computing environments and to propose institutional reforms. Unlike traditional physical storage media, cloud data is characterized by distribution, virtualization, multi-user environments, and cross-border storage, which conflict with the existing concepts of “objects to be seized” and “places to be searched” under the Korean Criminal Procedure Act. This paper classifies cloud search and seizure into four types—physical seizure of servers, compelled reproduction and submission by service providers, remote search and seizure, and extraterritorial remote search and seizure—and examines the legal and practical challenges inherent in each type. Key issues include ensuring the authenticity and integrity of digital evidence, handling unrelated data (so-called “separate-case information”), guaranteeing the participation rights of data subjects, and addressing jurisdictional conflicts. Based on these analyses, the study proposes several reforms, including the introduction of a statutory system for compelled submission, explicit legal provisions for remote and extraterritorial searches, a data preservation order, filtering mechanisms to minimize intrusion into unrelated data, and strengthening the participation rights of actual data owners. Ultimately, cloud search and seizure has become an indispensable investigative method in the digital age; however, it requires balanced institutional safeguards that protect fundamental rights while ensuring effective fact-finding. This paper contributes to establishing a foundation for more rational and detailed procedures in digital evidence investigations.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼