헌법 체계 부정합적인 우리나라 당사자주의론의 부정적 영향 = The Negative Effects of Korea’s One-sided Defendantism In the Trial Procedure, which is inconsistent with the Constitutional System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As part of the state's governance system under the Constitution, the usefulness of the theory of the establishment and operation of the criminal justice system depends on whether it can contribute to the establishment of the system and the realization of the objectives prescribed by the Constitution The theory of korea’s one-sided defendantism in the trial procedure(hereinafter “the korea’s theory”) is an essential problem in that it has lost or significantly damaged constitutional normative power in the area of the criminal justice system by downgrading the discourse on the constitutional status, authority and rights of public prosecutors and the defendant to legal discourse that exclude constitutional standards, due to misconceptions and expressions of value bias in the historical development process of the criminal justice system, which is the premise and background of the constitution.
The loss of normative power of the Constitution leads to negative effects such as being governed by legal omnipotence and formal rule of law in the field of criminal prosecution enforcement that must be operated according to the structure of vertical separation of powers of 'pubilc prosecutor general(attorney general) - public prosecutor - judicial police' which is the constitutional basic structure, weakness of judicial character and professionalism in the area, widespread permission of presiding over the execution of criminal justice by judicial police-not legal experts-, the regression to a fragmented criminal prosecution system where the unitary command and supervision system under the Constitution collapsed, the crisis of separation of powers due to the strengthening of administrative dependence in the field of public criminal prosecution, the weakening of the court's the sense of vocation for constitutional responsibility for finding the truth and the breakdown of constitutional system consistency that reduces efficiency to the extent that it is difficult to operate normally as a response system to crimes.
The negative impact of the korea’s theory as described above seriously undermines the nation's entire criminal prosecution capacity necessary to fulfill its constitutional obligation to protect the basic rights of the people from crime and corruption. In order to overcome such negative situations, a new approach and theoretical improvement are needed to the korea’s theory