RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    우리나라 자동차세 개편 방안 = Automobile Tax Reform Plan in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109951630

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    While discussions on automobile tax reform have been active recently, many have focused on restructuring the ownership tax system based on vehicle ownership, leaving a lack of a comprehensive review of the overall automobile tax system.
    This study aims to analyze the regional equity of automobile tax reform from the perspective of the current automobile taxation principles under local tax law, targeting all vehicles, rather than focusing on contemporary issues such as environmental friendliness related to the recent automobile tax reform.
    Overseas examples include taxation based on the high road usage of commercial vehicles, taxation based on the contribution of trucks to road damage, strengthening the property tax nature of automobile tax, and mileage-based taxation.
    Because much time has passed since 1992 and various circumstances have changed, the automobile tax system must also consider equity among taxpayers—namely, equity between commercial and non-commercial vehicles, passenger cars and trucks, buses, etc. For commercial vehicles, it's necessary to reflect the social costs associated with mileage and road use, such as traffic congestion, accidents, and environmental burden, rather than excessive tax exemptions.
    Reforming Korea's automobile tax system requires restructuring the system to reflect inflation in line with tax principles.
    A reasonable approach to automobile tax reform should adhere to the Ability to Pay Principle, the Benefit Principle, and the Neutrality Principle.
    번역하기

    While discussions on automobile tax reform have been active recently, many have focused on restructuring the ownership tax system based on vehicle ownership, leaving a lack of a comprehensive review of the overall automobile tax system. Thi...

    While discussions on automobile tax reform have been active recently, many have focused on restructuring the ownership tax system based on vehicle ownership, leaving a lack of a comprehensive review of the overall automobile tax system.
    This study aims to analyze the regional equity of automobile tax reform from the perspective of the current automobile taxation principles under local tax law, targeting all vehicles, rather than focusing on contemporary issues such as environmental friendliness related to the recent automobile tax reform.
    Overseas examples include taxation based on the high road usage of commercial vehicles, taxation based on the contribution of trucks to road damage, strengthening the property tax nature of automobile tax, and mileage-based taxation.
    Because much time has passed since 1992 and various circumstances have changed, the automobile tax system must also consider equity among taxpayers—namely, equity between commercial and non-commercial vehicles, passenger cars and trucks, buses, etc. For commercial vehicles, it's necessary to reflect the social costs associated with mileage and road use, such as traffic congestion, accidents, and environmental burden, rather than excessive tax exemptions.
    Reforming Korea's automobile tax system requires restructuring the system to reflect inflation in line with tax principles.
    A reasonable approach to automobile tax reform should adhere to the Ability to Pay Principle, the Benefit Principle, and the Neutrality Principle.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼