RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전자소송시대의 소송기록 열람 및 판결서 공개에 대한 적정한 방안의 모색: 일본 민사소송법 개정 및 민사재판정보활용법 제정의 의의를 중심으로 = Toward an Appropriate Framework for Access to Court Records and Disclosure of Judgments in the Digital Era : The Significance of Japan’s Civil Procedure Reform and the Enactment of the Act on the Promotion of Utilization of Civil Judgment Information

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109931236

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Judgment information serves as a core resource for parties in dispute resolution and early settlement strategies. Through the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and similar technologies, public access to judgement information can be dramatically enhanced, and when made available at low cost, such access may significantly contribute to protecting vulnerable groups who face barriers to legal services. Furthermore, when judgment information are made available as open data, they offer valuable opportunities for legal scholars to engage in macro-level analyses, such as identifying trends in judicial decisions. Judgments, as official documents that reflect both the legal conclusions and the reasoning process of the judiciary, perform a public function and, under the principle of the rule of law, ought to be disclosed.
    From the perspective of litigants, however, the primary purpose of litigation is to seek redress for individual rights, not to contribute to the development of public database. Consequently, there may be resistance to the general disclosure of judgement information in the same manner as other public records. In practice, court records inevitably contain sensitive personal data and trade secrets of the litigants, raising the critical question of the extent to which such confidential information should be protected in the context of public access to judicial proceedings. While excessive protection of personal and business information may undermine the transparency and accountability promoted by open justice, it remains essential to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of litigants.
    From this perspective, Japan’s recent legislative developments require closer examination. Along with the introduction of electronic litigation, Japan revised the Civil Procedure Act to strengthen the confidentiality of court records and enacted the Act on the Promotion of Utilization of Civil Judgment Information, thereby establishing a legal foundation for the development of an open data system for judgment information. These reforms provide valuable comparative insights into how judgement inforamtion—particularly those that form the basis of legal services powered by AI and other legal technologies—can be disclosed and managed.
    번역하기

    Judgment information serves as a core resource for parties in dispute resolution and early settlement strategies. Through the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and similar technologies, public access to judgement information can be dramatica...

    Judgment information serves as a core resource for parties in dispute resolution and early settlement strategies. Through the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and similar technologies, public access to judgement information can be dramatically enhanced, and when made available at low cost, such access may significantly contribute to protecting vulnerable groups who face barriers to legal services. Furthermore, when judgment information are made available as open data, they offer valuable opportunities for legal scholars to engage in macro-level analyses, such as identifying trends in judicial decisions. Judgments, as official documents that reflect both the legal conclusions and the reasoning process of the judiciary, perform a public function and, under the principle of the rule of law, ought to be disclosed.
    From the perspective of litigants, however, the primary purpose of litigation is to seek redress for individual rights, not to contribute to the development of public database. Consequently, there may be resistance to the general disclosure of judgement information in the same manner as other public records. In practice, court records inevitably contain sensitive personal data and trade secrets of the litigants, raising the critical question of the extent to which such confidential information should be protected in the context of public access to judicial proceedings. While excessive protection of personal and business information may undermine the transparency and accountability promoted by open justice, it remains essential to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of litigants.
    From this perspective, Japan’s recent legislative developments require closer examination. Along with the introduction of electronic litigation, Japan revised the Civil Procedure Act to strengthen the confidentiality of court records and enacted the Act on the Promotion of Utilization of Civil Judgment Information, thereby establishing a legal foundation for the development of an open data system for judgment information. These reforms provide valuable comparative insights into how judgement inforamtion—particularly those that form the basis of legal services powered by AI and other legal technologies—can be disclosed and managed.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼