RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 계파정치의 특성과 제3정당의 한계 = Factional Politics and the Limits of Third-Party Viability in South Korea’s National Assembly Elections

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzes factional dynamics within South Korea’s two major parties during the 20th (2016) and 22nd (2024) National Assembly elections, focusing on how these internal structures influenced the success or failure of third-party formations. The analysis yields three key findings. First, while the characterization of factions as “interest-seeking loose organizations” was previously limited to conservative parties, similar patterns emerged within the Democratic Party of Korea during the 2024 election. As this organizational feature became widespread, dominant factions led by strong presidential contenders monopolized candidate nominations, marginalizing minority factions and increasing the likelihood of their collapse. Second, amid a political climate framed by call for regime change, minority faction legislators encountered greater difficulty in defecting from their parties or launching new ones. Even when such defections occurred, the lack of ideological or policy differentiation limited their appeal, and newly formed third parties struggled to recruit viable candidates. Third, voter behavior under South Korea’s impermissive electoral system further constrained third-party viability. Voters dissatisfied with mainstream parties were reluctant to support third-party candidates when polls showed low chances of success. Notably, trust in polling data significantly reduced the likelihood of supporting third-party candidates, underscoring the interaction between institutional constraints and voter expectations. These findings suggest that rising affective polarization may facilitate party capture by core supporters, intensify hostility toward dissenting factions, and ultimately undermine intra-party pluralism and the quality of representative democracy.
    번역하기

    This study analyzes factional dynamics within South Korea’s two major parties during the 20th (2016) and 22nd (2024) National Assembly elections, focusing on how these internal structures influenced the success or failure of third-party formations. ...

    This study analyzes factional dynamics within South Korea’s two major parties during the 20th (2016) and 22nd (2024) National Assembly elections, focusing on how these internal structures influenced the success or failure of third-party formations. The analysis yields three key findings. First, while the characterization of factions as “interest-seeking loose organizations” was previously limited to conservative parties, similar patterns emerged within the Democratic Party of Korea during the 2024 election. As this organizational feature became widespread, dominant factions led by strong presidential contenders monopolized candidate nominations, marginalizing minority factions and increasing the likelihood of their collapse. Second, amid a political climate framed by call for regime change, minority faction legislators encountered greater difficulty in defecting from their parties or launching new ones. Even when such defections occurred, the lack of ideological or policy differentiation limited their appeal, and newly formed third parties struggled to recruit viable candidates. Third, voter behavior under South Korea’s impermissive electoral system further constrained third-party viability. Voters dissatisfied with mainstream parties were reluctant to support third-party candidates when polls showed low chances of success. Notably, trust in polling data significantly reduced the likelihood of supporting third-party candidates, underscoring the interaction between institutional constraints and voter expectations. These findings suggest that rising affective polarization may facilitate party capture by core supporters, intensify hostility toward dissenting factions, and ultimately undermine intra-party pluralism and the quality of representative democracy.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼