RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독일 기본법상 무과실 책임의 법리에 관한 소고 = A Study on the Jurisprudence of No-fault Liability in Germany Constitution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108642206

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, we would like to review the jurisprudence of no-fault liability developed in the case of the German Federal Court from the perspective of a request under the constitution, and find implications for us by revealing that this trend has a basis under the constitution. In order to achieve the above research objectives, a literature research method is attempted to review books, papers, precedents, reports, and cases in Korea, Japan, and Germany on this topic. First, the theoretical background and development process of the German Federal Court on the jurisprudence of no-fault liability, It examines the views required by the principle of guaranteeing natural rights or the rule of law for the basis of national responsibility being discussed in Germany today. In Germany, regardless of the theoretical composition, a request to recognize non-fault liability for the entire national responsibility is at work from multiple basic legal grounds, and it shows a response to the request under the constitution of legality of state activities in some form. These discussions and the framework of the basic mindset in Germany, which is appropriate for the constitution, have great implications for us in the enactment of individual laws that must define national responsibility for illegal state activities in the future, and the interpretation of existing laws, Under the constitutional request of the legality of state activities, the issue of national responsibility is one of the important tasks of our public law in the future.
    번역하기

    In this study, we would like to review the jurisprudence of no-fault liability developed in the case of the German Federal Court from the perspective of a request under the constitution, and find implications for us by revealing that this trend has a ...

    In this study, we would like to review the jurisprudence of no-fault liability developed in the case of the German Federal Court from the perspective of a request under the constitution, and find implications for us by revealing that this trend has a basis under the constitution. In order to achieve the above research objectives, a literature research method is attempted to review books, papers, precedents, reports, and cases in Korea, Japan, and Germany on this topic. First, the theoretical background and development process of the German Federal Court on the jurisprudence of no-fault liability, It examines the views required by the principle of guaranteeing natural rights or the rule of law for the basis of national responsibility being discussed in Germany today. In Germany, regardless of the theoretical composition, a request to recognize non-fault liability for the entire national responsibility is at work from multiple basic legal grounds, and it shows a response to the request under the constitution of legality of state activities in some form. These discussions and the framework of the basic mindset in Germany, which is appropriate for the constitution, have great implications for us in the enactment of individual laws that must define national responsibility for illegal state activities in the future, and the interpretation of existing laws, Under the constitutional request of the legality of state activities, the issue of national responsibility is one of the important tasks of our public law in the future.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김남철, "행정법" 박영사 2023

    2 최정일, "독일에서의 수용유사침해법리와 그것의 한국법제에의 수용가능성에 관한 고찰" 행정법이론실무학회 (34) : 137-198, 2012

    3 주희열, "독일기본법 원론" 박영사 2004

    4 塩津徹, "現代ドイツ憲法史" 成⽂堂 2013

    5 渡邊亙, "国家賠償制度に対する憲法上の要請" 63 (63): 1-31, 2013

    6 藤⽥宙靖, "⾏政法総論" 青林書院 2018

    7 Denninger, Erhard, "VerwaltungsrechtⅢ" HdbPolR 2015

    8 Ossenbühl, Fritz, "Matthias Cornils, Staatahaftungsrecht" HdbPolR 2013

    9 Ossenbühl, Fritz, "Die vergessene Grundrechtsetung" U. Steiner 2018

    10 Maurer, Hartmut, "Der enteignende Eingriff und die ausgleichspflichtigeInhaltsbestimmung des Eigentum" Huster/Rudolph 1991

    1 김남철, "행정법" 박영사 2023

    2 최정일, "독일에서의 수용유사침해법리와 그것의 한국법제에의 수용가능성에 관한 고찰" 행정법이론실무학회 (34) : 137-198, 2012

    3 주희열, "독일기본법 원론" 박영사 2004

    4 塩津徹, "現代ドイツ憲法史" 成⽂堂 2013

    5 渡邊亙, "国家賠償制度に対する憲法上の要請" 63 (63): 1-31, 2013

    6 藤⽥宙靖, "⾏政法総論" 青林書院 2018

    7 Denninger, Erhard, "VerwaltungsrechtⅢ" HdbPolR 2015

    8 Ossenbühl, Fritz, "Matthias Cornils, Staatahaftungsrecht" HdbPolR 2013

    9 Ossenbühl, Fritz, "Die vergessene Grundrechtsetung" U. Steiner 2018

    10 Maurer, Hartmut, "Der enteignende Eingriff und die ausgleichspflichtigeInhaltsbestimmung des Eigentum" Huster/Rudolph 1991

    11 Maurer, Hartmut, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" JZ 2011

    12 Steffen, Detterbeck, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" Besonderes derVerlag 2019

    13 Bernd, Grzeszic, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht" U. Steiner 2010

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼