RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    미얀마 군부 정권의 대중동원 메커니즘 = Mass mobilization under military rule in Myanmar

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107941228

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The research questions do authoritarian regimes need popular supports? In this research, I contend that an authoritarian regime would not achieve its designed goals without popular and partisan support for authoritarian rulers' institutional agendas as political institutions undergird its rule. The study suggests that not only can political parties and interest groups contribute to an authoritarian's mobilising capacity, but also a distinctive type of organisation can strengthen this capacity. I theorise that the necessary supports from the mass would come either from mass-formed organisations or political parties. The study focuses on the case of mass mobilisation by the military regime in Myanmar since 1988. The military regime achieved its mobilisation capacity by establishing a government-sponsored organisation, the Union Solidarity and Development Association, formed in 1993. The formation and mobilisation have been geared toward accomplishing the regime's transition plan to disciplined-flourishing democracy. Indeed, it held several pro-government mass rallies across the country under the theme of supporting the regime's policies, such as convening the National Convention for writing a new constitution, anti-subversion law, and seven steps roadmap to democracy. Later, the members of the association joined as the representatives for the constitution-writing process. Furthermore, the organisation transformed itself from a patron organisation into a political party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), before the 2010 general election. The party achieved most seats in the new parliament in 2011 and influenced major political decision-making processes in the legislature. The mass mobilisation by the military regime has provided a safe environment in the post-authoritarian society.
    번역하기

    The research questions do authoritarian regimes need popular supports? In this research, I contend that an authoritarian regime would not achieve its designed goals without popular and partisan support for authoritarian rulers' institutional agendas a...

    The research questions do authoritarian regimes need popular supports? In this research, I contend that an authoritarian regime would not achieve its designed goals without popular and partisan support for authoritarian rulers' institutional agendas as political institutions undergird its rule. The study suggests that not only can political parties and interest groups contribute to an authoritarian's mobilising capacity, but also a distinctive type of organisation can strengthen this capacity. I theorise that the necessary supports from the mass would come either from mass-formed organisations or political parties. The study focuses on the case of mass mobilisation by the military regime in Myanmar since 1988. The military regime achieved its mobilisation capacity by establishing a government-sponsored organisation, the Union Solidarity and Development Association, formed in 1993. The formation and mobilisation have been geared toward accomplishing the regime's transition plan to disciplined-flourishing democracy. Indeed, it held several pro-government mass rallies across the country under the theme of supporting the regime's policies, such as convening the National Convention for writing a new constitution, anti-subversion law, and seven steps roadmap to democracy. Later, the members of the association joined as the representatives for the constitution-writing process. Furthermore, the organisation transformed itself from a patron organisation into a political party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), before the 2010 general election. The party achieved most seats in the new parliament in 2011 and influenced major political decision-making processes in the legislature. The mass mobilisation by the military regime has provided a safe environment in the post-authoritarian society.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Frontier Myanmar, "Yangon pro-military rally draws thousands as Wirathu hits back at UN"

    2 Geddes, Babara, "What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?" 2 : 115-144, 1999

    3 Kaung, B, "USDA ‘Abolished’: Officical"

    4 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA General Meeting"

    5 The New Light of Myanmar, "USDA Annual Meeting"

    6 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA Annual Meeting"

    7 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA Annual Meeting"

    8 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA"

    9 The New Light of Myanmar, "US Assistant Secretary of State meets SPDC"

    10 Ko Htwe, "Two More Parties Apply for Registration"

    1 Frontier Myanmar, "Yangon pro-military rally draws thousands as Wirathu hits back at UN"

    2 Geddes, Babara, "What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?" 2 : 115-144, 1999

    3 Kaung, B, "USDA ‘Abolished’: Officical"

    4 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA General Meeting"

    5 The New Light of Myanmar, "USDA Annual Meeting"

    6 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA Annual Meeting"

    7 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA Annual Meeting"

    8 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "USDA"

    9 The New Light of Myanmar, "US Assistant Secretary of State meets SPDC"

    10 Ko Htwe, "Two More Parties Apply for Registration"

    11 Linz, Huan, "Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes" Lynne Rienner Publishers

    12 Network for Democracy and Development[NDD], "The White Shirt: How the USDA will become the new face of Burma’s dictatorship"

    13 Taylor, Robert, "The State in Myanmar" Hurst Publishers 2009

    14 The Global New Light of Myanmar, "The Speech made by State Administration Council Chairman Senior Generla Min Aung Hlaing on the occasion of six month on 1 August 2020"

    15 Lintner, Bertil, "The Shans and the Shan State of Burma" 5 (5): 403-450, 1984

    16 Nathan, Andrew J, "The Puzzle of Authoritarian Legitimacy" 31 (31): 158-168, 2020

    17 Svolik, Milan W, "The Politics of Authoritarian Rule" Cambridge University Press 2012

    18 Butwell, Richard, "The New Political Outlook in Burma" 29 (29): 21-27, 1960

    19 Silverstein, Josef, "The Federal Dilemma in Burma" 28 (28): 97-105, 1959

    20 Khin Yi, "The Dobama Movement in Burma (1930-1938)" Cornell University Press 1988

    21 The New Light of Myanmar, "The Clarification by Dr. Ma Nam Tu Ja"

    22 Kratoska, Paul, "The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia" 249-324, 2008

    23 Bigelow, Lee S, "The 1960 Election in Burma" 29 (29): 70-74, 1960

    24 Fairbairn, Geoffrey, "Some Minority Problems in Burma" 30 (30): 299-311, 1975

    25 Cheesman, Nick, "Seeing ‘Karen’ in the Union of Myanmar" 3 (3): 199-220, 2002

    26 Working People’s Daily, "Saw Maung’s Speech on 28th October 1988"

    27 Medecins Sans Frontiers, "Rohingya Refugee Crisis"

    28 Hellmeier, Sebastian, "Pulling the Strings? The Strategic Use of Pro-Government Mobilization in Authoritarian Regimes" 53 (53): 71-108, 2020

    29 Ad hoc Commission on Depayin Massacre, "Preliminary report of the Ad Hoc Commission on Depayin Massacre (Burma)"

    30 Yawnghwe, Chao-Tzang, "Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: the quest for moral authority" Stanford University Press 170-192, 1995

    31 Alagappa, Muthiath, "Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The quest for moral authority" Stanford University Press 1995

    32 Barker, Rodney, "Political legitimacy and the state" Clarendon Press 1990

    33 The New Light of Myanmar, "National Convention –Plenary Session"

    34 Kaung, B., "NDF Reponds to Suu Kyi’s Criticism"

    35 The Guardian, "Myanmar military supporters attack anti-coup protesters"

    36 Buchana, John, "Militias in Myanmar" The Asia Foundation 2016

    37 Handlin, Samuel, "Mass Organization and the Durability of Competitive Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from Venezuela" 49 (49): 1238-1269, 2016

    38 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "In an address to the 39th General Staff training course by General Saw Maung"

    39 Pho Thar Aung, "From Pyusawhti too the Present"

    40 Ministry of Defense, "Defense White Paper 2015" 2015

    41 Svolik, Milan W., "Contracting on Violence : The Moral Hazard in Authoritarian Repression and Military Intervention in Politics" 57 (57): 765-794, 2013

    42 The New Light of Myanmar, "Ceremony to support National Convention and constitution held in Kengtung"

    43 Borger, J., "Burmese PM and Cabinet resign from army to stand as civilians in election"

    44 Silverstein, Josef, "Burma: Military Rule and the Politics of Stagnation" Cornell University Press 1977

    45 Human Rights Watch, "Burma: Military Party Guaranteed to Dominate Elections[Press release]"

    46 Steinberg, David I, "Burma Under the Military Towards a Chronology" 3 (3): 244-285, 1981

    47 Steinberg, David I, "Burma Debate" Open Society 4-11, 1997

    48 The Global New Light of Myanmar, "Appointment and assignment of Chairmen of State/Region Administration Councils"

    49 The New Light of Myanmar, "Applications to form political parties scrutinized and passed"

    50 Hugh, C. MacDougall, "Anti-Subversion Law/Mass Rallies against subversion"

    51 The New Light of Myanmar, "Announcement on results of the referendum held in the whole country"

    52 Frontier Myanmar, "A threat to the revolution’: Pyusawhti returns to post-coup Myanmar"

    53 Zaw, Aung, "A Junta by any other name"

    54 The New Light of Myanmar, "14,000 USDA membership applications submitted in Thaton Kyaikhto and Bilin"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.63
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.58 0.52 0.812 0.18
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼