RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    아파트 단지 출입구 및 통행로의 주정차행위 단속을 위한 도로교통법 개정안에 대한 소고 = A Juridical Study on Amendment to the Road Traffic Act about Traffic Enforcement on Parking the Vehicles at an Angle at the Entrance and Passageway of the Apartment Complex

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Police officer or officer in City Hall can not take any action when a driver is blocking the passage of residents’ vehicles by parking the car at an angle at the entrance of the apartment complex or on the passageway in the complex. This is because it does not fall under ‘road’ under the Road Act or the Road Traffic Act.
    Police Officer may issue an order to move or change the parking method to a driver of an illegally parked vehicle. Otherwise, the police officer may move or change it himself in accordance with article 35 of the Road Traffic Act. But in order to take these measures, the place must be a ‘road’ under the Road Traffic Act. ‘Road’ in the Road Traffic Act means not only a road under the Road Act, but also an open place where an unspecified number of people or vehicles can pass freely. However, the above place is not a place where an unspecified number of people or vehicles can pass freely, so it is not a ‘road’ under the Road Traffic Act. And police officers cannot take the above measures, They just can apply the Criminal Law of general traffic obstruction.
    Article 185 of the Criminal Law punishes “a person who damages or obstructs a land road, waterway, or bridge, or obstructs traffic in other ways” for the offense of obstructing general traffic. The criminality depends on whether the place is land road or not. Land road means a public place where an unspecified number of people or vehicles can pass freely, so the above places do not fall under this category and cannot be punished as a general traffic obstruction crime. In the end, it can only be punished as obstruction of business in the sense that it interfered with the work of the apartment management office or security guard. However, the action that apartment residents want is to secure safe and smooth traffic at the site, not post criminal punishment.
    This is why the definition of road by the Road Traffic Act must be reinterpreted. For this purpose, I used 3 interpretation methodologies, namely historic, grammatical and teleological interpretation method. As a result of this analysis, it’s found reasonable to interpret the concept of ‘road’ in the Road Traffic Act as a place for the passage of unspecified or a large number of people or vehicles as a place where it is necessary to secure safe and smooth traffic realistically. However this leads to burden of expenses. For this reason, I propose to insert a provisoclause in the article No-Parking Zone as an amendment to the Road Traffic Act.
    번역하기

    Police officer or officer in City Hall can not take any action when a driver is blocking the passage of residents’ vehicles by parking the car at an angle at the entrance of the apartment complex or on the passageway in the complex. This is because ...

    Police officer or officer in City Hall can not take any action when a driver is blocking the passage of residents’ vehicles by parking the car at an angle at the entrance of the apartment complex or on the passageway in the complex. This is because it does not fall under ‘road’ under the Road Act or the Road Traffic Act.
    Police Officer may issue an order to move or change the parking method to a driver of an illegally parked vehicle. Otherwise, the police officer may move or change it himself in accordance with article 35 of the Road Traffic Act. But in order to take these measures, the place must be a ‘road’ under the Road Traffic Act. ‘Road’ in the Road Traffic Act means not only a road under the Road Act, but also an open place where an unspecified number of people or vehicles can pass freely. However, the above place is not a place where an unspecified number of people or vehicles can pass freely, so it is not a ‘road’ under the Road Traffic Act. And police officers cannot take the above measures, They just can apply the Criminal Law of general traffic obstruction.
    Article 185 of the Criminal Law punishes “a person who damages or obstructs a land road, waterway, or bridge, or obstructs traffic in other ways” for the offense of obstructing general traffic. The criminality depends on whether the place is land road or not. Land road means a public place where an unspecified number of people or vehicles can pass freely, so the above places do not fall under this category and cannot be punished as a general traffic obstruction crime. In the end, it can only be punished as obstruction of business in the sense that it interfered with the work of the apartment management office or security guard. However, the action that apartment residents want is to secure safe and smooth traffic at the site, not post criminal punishment.
    This is why the definition of road by the Road Traffic Act must be reinterpreted. For this purpose, I used 3 interpretation methodologies, namely historic, grammatical and teleological interpretation method. As a result of this analysis, it’s found reasonable to interpret the concept of ‘road’ in the Road Traffic Act as a place for the passage of unspecified or a large number of people or vehicles as a place where it is necessary to secure safe and smooth traffic realistically. However this leads to burden of expenses. For this reason, I propose to insert a provisoclause in the article No-Parking Zone as an amendment to the Road Traffic Act.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박상기, "형사정책" 형사정책연구원 2001

    2 이상돈, "형법강론" 박영사 2020

    3 정영석, "형법각론" 법문사 1993

    4 임웅, "형법각론" 법문사 2002

    5 김일수, "형법각론" 박영사 2001

    6 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 1999

    7 조준현, "형법각론" 법원사 2002

    8 조현욱, "형법 제185조(일반교통방해죄)의 문제점과 개선방안" 법제처 2018 (2018): 139-164, 2018

    9 남선모, "현행 도로교통법의 실무적용상 문제점에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (28) : 313-336, 2007

    10 서정범, "행정법총론" 세창출판사 2017

    1 박상기, "형사정책" 형사정책연구원 2001

    2 이상돈, "형법강론" 박영사 2020

    3 정영석, "형법각론" 법문사 1993

    4 임웅, "형법각론" 법문사 2002

    5 김일수, "형법각론" 박영사 2001

    6 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 1999

    7 조준현, "형법각론" 법원사 2002

    8 조현욱, "형법 제185조(일반교통방해죄)의 문제점과 개선방안" 법제처 2018 (2018): 139-164, 2018

    9 남선모, "현행 도로교통법의 실무적용상 문제점에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (28) : 313-336, 2007

    10 서정범, "행정법총론" 세창출판사 2017

    11 김남철, "행정법입문" 정독 2021

    12 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2013

    13 이주원, "특별형법" 홍문사 2018

    14 양동철, "통고처분에 따른 범칙금납부의 효력과 일사부재리에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 47 (47): 223-262, 2012

    15 조현욱, "차량교통이 통제된 도로에서 진행된 집회․시위에 참가한 사람에 대한 일반교통방해죄 성립 여부-대법원 2018. 1. 24. 선고 2017도11408 판결-" 한국법학원 168 : 331-356, 2018

    16 신은영, "집회․시위에 대한 형법 제185조 (일반교통방해죄) 적용의 문제점" 안암법학회 (37) : 297-329, 2012

    17 한인섭, "일반교통방해죄와 집회시위에의 그 적용을 둘러싼 문제" 한국형사법학회 21 (21): 353-374, 2009

    18 박원규, "위험방지법으로서의 도로교통법— 개인형 이동수단에 대한 법적 규율체계 개선방안 —" 법학연구소 36 (36): 109-134, 2019

    19 정우일, "우리나라 교통범칙금제도에 관한 논의" 한국경찰학회 11 (11): 377-400, 2009

    20 하태훈, "법치국가에서의 형법과 형사소송법의 과제 - 최근 형사 관련법 개정경향을 중심으로 -" 법학연구원 (62) : 19-51, 2011

    21 신형석, "도로의 법률적 의미와 범위에 대한 소고 ― 도로교통법 제2조 제1호를 중심으로 ―" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 21 (21): 237-269, 2013

    22 계인국, "도로법제의 체계 검토 - 도로의 상태와 사용 기준을 중심으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 92 : 93-112, 2020

    23 김현철, "도로교통법상의 해석⋅운용에 관한 몇가지 문제점에 관한 소고" 법조협회 504 (504): 118-140, 1998

    24 김남현, "도로교통법상 처벌규정에 관한 약간의 고찰" 법학연구원 12 (12): 209-256, 2002

    25 김원주, "도로교통법상 도로의 의의" 고시계사 42 (42): 121-128, 1997

    26 정초영, "도로교통법상 도로에 관한 고찰" 치안정책연구소 2007

    27 방극봉, "도로교통법상 ‘도로’의 의미" 법제처 (516) : 51-66, 2000

    28 정신교, "도로교통범죄의 법적용에 관한 고찰" 청주대학교 학술연구소 24 : 103-140, 2005

    29 박병욱, "대학내 도로의 공법적 조명과 대학내 교통사고 형사처리의 문제점 - 교통사고처리특례법 제3조 제2항 단서 제13호 신설 제안 -" 한국경찰법학회 17 (17): 3-43, 2019

    30 성홍재, "경범죄처벌법 신설조항에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 관공서 주취소란행위를 대상으로 -" 경찰대학 13 (13): 163-189, 2013

    31 김원중, "「도로교통법」상의 법률용어 개념의 불명확성에 관한 검토" 유럽헌법학회 (29) : 221-245, 2019

    32 Sauthoff, Michael, "Öffentliche Straßen: : Straßenrecht - Straßenverkehrsrecht - Verkehrssicherungspflichten" C. H. Beck 2010

    33 Manssen, Gerrit, "Vom Vorrang zur Vorherrschaft des Straßenverkehrsrechts" 151-158, 2001

    34 Burmann, Michael, "Straßenverkehrsrecht" C.H. Beck 2018

    35 Hentschel, Peter, "Straßenverkehrsrecht" C.H. Beck 2019

    36 Zipf, Heinz, "Kriminalpolitik" C. F. Müller 1980

    37 Kniesel, Michael, "Handbuch des Polizeirechts" C.H. Beck 2018

    38 Schlanstein, Peter, "Die polizeiliche Generalklausel in der Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit" 105-111, 2015

    39 Schoch, Friedrich, "Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht" C. H. Beck 2013

    40 이장선, "13번째 교통경찰" 좋은땅 2016

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
    2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼