범죄자 신상공개와 인격권 = Disclosure of personal information about offender and Personality Rights

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Whether it is possible to disclose a criminal's personal information in the media should be judged by balancing the criminal's personality rights against the public interests of information. The balancing process should examine the area of personality associated with a criminal fact, how it is disclosed and what is disclosed, the stage of the judicial process, the clarity of evidence, and the public interest in the information about the crime etc.
Disclosure of personal information of sex offenders seriously infringe their personality rights. On the other hand, it is not clear whether the public interests in protecting potential victims and society is being achieved. Since it treats criminals as means rather than as a subject of personality, there is a risk of infringing on human dignity.
In the case of < Digital Prison >, the degree of infringement of personality rights is serious, and it is difficult to recognize the public interest in that it is private retaliation. On the other hand, in the case of < Bad Fathers >, the degree of infringement of personality rights is relatively small. Since this can induce payment of child support, it can be a means of solving the problem of non-payment of child support. However, even in this case, the problem of infringement of human dignity may be raised.
It is said that the government recently decided to disclose the personal information of non-payers of child support. However, considering the problems of the personal information disclosure system, it is necessary to be cautious about introducing such a system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2013

2 양 건, "헌법강의" 법문사 2013

3 신평, "한국의 언론법" 높이깊이 2014

4 문재완, "프라이버시 보호를 목적으로 하는 인터넷 규제의 의의와 한계 -‘잊혀질 권리’ 논의를 중심으로-" (사)한국언론법학회 10 (10): 1-37, 2011

5 박용숙, "잊혀질 권리에 관한 헌법적 고찰" 한국헌법학회 21 (21): 311-348, 2015

6 이준일, "인권법" 홍문사 2017

7 김종구, "인간의 존엄과 형사사법개혁 -새로운 형사제재수단과 관련하여-" 법학연구원 26 (26): 171-204, 2019

8 김재형, "언론의 사실보도로 인한 인격권 침해" 39 (39): 189-219, 1998

9 한기택, "언론의 범죄사건 보도에 있어서 익명보도의 원칙" (31) : 110-128, 1999

10 이연갑, "실명보도와 불법행위책임- 대법원 2007. 7. 12. 선고 2006다65620 판결(공보불게재) -" 법조협회 58 (58): 325-357, 2009

11 성중탁, "성범죄자 신상정보등록·공개제도의 문제점과 개선방안" 유럽헌법학회 (32) : 273-310, 2020

12 양재규, "범죄수사 관련 보도자료 기사화(일명 ‘수사기관 처널리즘’)의 법적 문제점" 언론중재위원회 3 (3): 179-210, 2017

13 문재완, "범죄보도와 무죄추정원칙" (사)한국언론법학회 19 (19): 77-113, 2020

14 김수철, "방송에 의한 범죄보도와 인격권 – 독일연방헌법재판소 제1법정 1973년 6월 5일 판결(BVerfGE 35, 202, Lebach 판결)의 연구-" 41 (41): 9-16, 1973

15 박용상, "명예훼손법" 현암사 2008

16 권태상, "공적 인물의 사생활 - 대법원 2013. 6. 27. 선고 2012다31628 판결 -" 법학연구소 21 (21): 241-283, 2017

17 류영재, "[판례평석] 범죄사건 보도로 인한 불법행위 책임에 대한 검토 - 대상판결: 대법원 2016. 5. 27. 선고 2015다33489 판결 -" 언론중재위원회 4 (4): 125-173, 2018

18 Sack, Robert D., "Sack on defamation" Practicing Law Institute 2011

19 The American Law Institute, "Restatement of the law: Torts" American Law Institute Publishers 1977

20 Robers, Julain V., "Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons From Five Countries" Oxford University Press 2003

21 Wegner, Konstantin, "Handbuch des persönlichkeitsrechts" C.H.Beck 489-547, 2008