북한 역사학 형성에 소련 역사학이 미친 영향 = The Influence of Soviet Historiography on the Formation of North Korean Historiography

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Early North Korean historiography actively embraced Soviet historiography. Stalinist historiography, formed since the 1930s, was a national history of the Soviet Union respecting Russian nationalism based on historical materialism. The ideologies and methods of Soviet historiography were consistent with the goal of North Korean historiography to develop the history of the nation under the banner of anti-colonialism.
The publication of History Science in 1955 was a new beginning for North Korean historiography. While the core content of North Korean historiography was nationalism, the main form of it was collective research, especially the culture of “criticism and self-criticism”. Linking with the historiography of the Soviet Union, which had melted after Stalin’s death in 1953, the culture of “criticism and self-criticism” was created in North Korean history academia. The historiography of North Korea and the Soviet Union became rigid side by side as they experienced the Hungarian crisis and “August Plenary Meeting” in Pyongyang, 1956. Criticism and purging of Lee Cheong-won symbolize the politicization of North Korean historiography.
In 1960, the Party-sprit principle and Historicism principle were established as ideologies of North Korean historiography. North Korean historiography criticized Soviet historiography and tried to distance itself from it, but this was a process of internalizing Soviet historiography. In the 1960s, North Korean historiography achieved the theory of developmental stages of national history through the debate on slavery and the time frame of modern and contemporary times. The development and consequences of various debates in the North Korean historiography are strongly influenced by the Soviet historiography.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 立石洋子, "｢雪どけ｣とソ連の歴史学 — 1953-56年の歴史の諸問題誌の活動" 87 : 2017

2 조호연, "특집논문 : 역사인식 속에서의 냉전 - 북한 역사학계의 러시아사 이해" 한국서양사학회 (127) : 71-106, 2015

3 김재웅, "특집 : 현실정치의 규정력 아래 놓인 해방 후 북한의 역사서술 - 북한 역사서술의 시원 검토 -" 한국역사연구회 (96) : 141-185, 2015

4 디미트로프, "통일전선연구 — 반파시즘 통일전선에 대하여" 거름 1987

5 황동하, "코민테른" 서해문집 2009

6 홍종욱, "실증사학의 ‘이념’ — 식민지 조선에 온 역사주의" 인문학연구원 76 (76): 287-323, 2019

7 조호연, "스탈린 시대의 역사학" 경남대 인문과학연구소 14 : 2001

8 이병천, "북한학계의 한국근대사논쟁 — 사회성격과 시대구분 문제 —" 창작과비평사 1989

9 송호정, "북한의 한국사인식 1" 한길사 1990

10 김태우, "북한의 스탈린 민족이론 수용과 이탈 과정" 한국역사연구회 (44) : 256-285, 2002

11 김광운, "북한 민족주의 역사학의 궤적과 환경" 한국사연구회 (152) : 273-306, 2011

12 노경덕, "바르가논쟁의 재고, 1941-1949" 역사학회 (206) : 245-277, 2010

13 "로동신문"

14 "근로자"

15 "국제생활"

16 조수룡, "경합하는 ‘혁명전통’ -북한 초기 역사학계의 민족해방운동사 이해와 재구축-" 한국사학회 (137) : 125-162, 2020

17 和田春樹, "現代社会主義 その多元的諸相" 東京大学出版会 1977

18 "歷史諸問題"

19 和田春樹, "戦後ソ連における歴史家と歴史学 — ソ連史学史ノート(その一)" 25 : 1976

20 立石洋子, "国民統合と歴史学: スターリン期ソ連における｢国民史｣論争" 学術出版会 2011

21 홍종욱, "反식민주의 역사학에서 反역사학으로 - 동아시아의 ‘戰後 역사학’과 북한의 역사 서술 -" 역사문제연구소 18 (18): 70-108, 2014

22 和田春樹, "スターリン批判 1953∼56年：一人の独裁者の死が、いかに20世紀世界を揺り動かしたか" 作品社 2016

23 Kojevnikov, A, "Stalinism: New Directions, edited by Sheila Fitzpatrick" Routledge 2000

24 홍종욱, "1950년대 북한의 반둥회의와 비동맹운동 인식 -잡지 『국제생활』 기사를 중심으로" 동북아역사재단 (61) : 375-406, 2018