John Steinbeck’s Sweet Thursday is remarkably ambivalent in terms of the theme and the artistry. And also Carl Jung’s psychology has so many dualistic concepts—persona and collective, conscious and unconscious, hero and shadow, anima and animus,...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106936063
2015
English
존 스타인벡 ; 칼 융 ; 『달콤한 목요일』 ; 양면성 ; 분석심리학 ; John Steinbeck ; Carl Jung ; Sweet Thursday ; ambivalence ; analytical psychology
KCI등재
학술저널
459-479(21쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
John Steinbeck’s Sweet Thursday is remarkably ambivalent in terms of the theme and the artistry. And also Carl Jung’s psychology has so many dualistic concepts—persona and collective, conscious and unconscious, hero and shadow, anima and animus,...
John Steinbeck’s Sweet Thursday is remarkably ambivalent in terms of the theme and the artistry. And also Carl Jung’s psychology has so many dualistic concepts—persona and collective, conscious and unconscious, hero and shadow, anima and animus, neurosis and psychosis. Based on this relationship between psychology and literature, this paper tries a new research which scholars have covered: to introduce the concept of ambivalence, meaning ambivalent dualism as a human psychological attribute; observe the core theory of Carl Jung’s psychology; illuminate the appearances of ambivalence of Sweet Thursday roughly in order of the plot; and criticize the textual evidences of ambivalence on the basis of an analytical psychology. Lastly, this paper wishes to be a catalyst for answering the question of what a human being.
D. H. 로렌스의 『채털리 부인의 사랑』: 코니의 자아 저술하기
19세기 통합적 지식인으로서의 에머슨의 ‘시인-과학자’의 이상
Spiritual Homosociality in The Tempest: Magic and Moral Superiority