RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    가상과 실재, 포스트휴먼 시대에 인간의 삶과 의미 부여 = Virtual and real, human life and significance in posthuman era

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106294565

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to examine how human beings put the signification on the virtual and the real in the post-human era. To this purpose, we have used some of the discussions of Roland Barthes and Jean Baudrillard. We have pointed out that Barthes’s arguments should be dealt with in the “Translinguistic” dimension of Emile Benveniste for the purpose of this article. In particular, when Barthes’s theories are viewed in the context of semiotics, his analysis can be considered a practical example of Saussure’s definition of semiotics, ‘a life of signs in social life’ most clearly. Through this, we can see that Barthes’s theories can be applied to the posthuman era. Baudrillard argues for the overthrow of virtual and real. He says that it does not matter what the original referent of the hyperreal is, and it no longer exists anymore. Hyperreal is not real, but now it has become a more obvious reality than reality. We do not meet the imagination in one sense, but experience it in all senses and immerse emotions as if we are facing reality. And the significance of this virtual is not already defined, but it is a personalized experience. It is not just anyone else, or anything that I have experienced before, but a new personal experience that is new every time.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to examine how human beings put the signification on the virtual and the real in the post-human era. To this purpose, we have used some of the discussions of Roland Barthes and Jean Baudrillard. We have pointed out that Ba...

    The purpose of this paper is to examine how human beings put the signification on the virtual and the real in the post-human era. To this purpose, we have used some of the discussions of Roland Barthes and Jean Baudrillard. We have pointed out that Barthes’s arguments should be dealt with in the “Translinguistic” dimension of Emile Benveniste for the purpose of this article. In particular, when Barthes’s theories are viewed in the context of semiotics, his analysis can be considered a practical example of Saussure’s definition of semiotics, ‘a life of signs in social life’ most clearly. Through this, we can see that Barthes’s theories can be applied to the posthuman era. Baudrillard argues for the overthrow of virtual and real. He says that it does not matter what the original referent of the hyperreal is, and it no longer exists anymore. Hyperreal is not real, but now it has become a more obvious reality than reality. We do not meet the imagination in one sense, but experience it in all senses and immerse emotions as if we are facing reality. And the significance of this virtual is not already defined, but it is a personalized experience. It is not just anyone else, or anything that I have experienced before, but a new personal experience that is new every time.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼