입찰담합 유형별 과징금 산정방식의 제문제 - 공정거래법 시행령 제9조 제1항 단서의 해석론 및 관련매출액 중복 산입 쟁점을 중심으로 = Categories of Bid-Rigging and issues Related to the calculation of Administrative Fines

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper categorizes the types of bid collusion into three categories. First, in the so-called 'one-time bid-rigging', the contract amount of the bidding is added to the related sales to impose certain sanctions on the complementary bid (Type 1). Such complementary bidder may not have had direct benefits in the bid, but may have had an invisible indirect benefit. For depriving it, as a proxy variable, the contract amount of the bidding is included in the related sales of the complementary bidder. The underlying rule is Article 9 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Fair Trade Act, which is an exception to the principle that only the sales that are acquired by the self in the cartel.
Second, it is a type that cooperate(complementary bid) with the successful bidders in order to distribute the bids divided into several (Type 2). The FTC has tended to calculate only contract amount of the bidding that was won, but the contract amount of complementary bids are included in the related sales from the cartel case of Honam High Speed Rail which was processed in 2014. However, the FTC revised the regulations so that the total amount of related sales for complementary bid is calculated up to twice the contract amount.
Third, it is the type in which cartel is made on bidding to select 'multiple winners' (Type 3). For this type, the FTC has calculated only the amount of money that each party has won as related sales. However, there has been a case in which the sum of the contract amount of all the successful bidder is included in the related sales of each individual from the case treated in 2018. If this is going to be used in the future, for example, in the case of a bid of 10 winning bidder, related sales can be doubled to 10 times. In this paper, we review the interpretation theory of the bid-rigging regulation in relation to the issue of duplicating related sales.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 주진열, "카르텔 억지 및 피해자의 효과적 구제를 위한 독점규제법의 사적 집행 방안" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (34) : 371-395, 2012

2 이선희, "입찰담합에 있어서 들러리 참여자에 대한 과징금산정기준" 법조협회 59 (59): 268-308, 2010

3 홍대식, "입찰 방식 거래에서의 합의에 대한 과징금 산정 기준" (184) : 2016

4 강우찬, "입찰 관련 부당공동행위의 관련시장획정 및 관련 매출액 산정" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 291-329, 2015

5 홍대식, "부당한 공동행위에 대한 과징금 산정의 실무상 쟁점" 한국경쟁법학회 32 : 112-151, 2015

6 권오승, "독점규제법 이론과 실무" 법문사 2018

7 김일중, "과징금 제도 운영 현황 및 개선방안에 관한 연구" 국회예산정책처 2017

8 감사원, "과징금 산정ㆍ감액관련 제도 및 운영 부적정" 2016

9 하종대, "공정거래법 판례선집" 2011

10 공정위, "공정거래 법집행체계 개선 TF 최종보고서" 2018

11 공정위, "2017년도 통계연보"