In this paper, we investigated the inward consciousness of Chosun intellectuals about the modern period and Japan at the end of the 19th century by Donghaengilrok(東行日錄), a report of public journey written by Min Geon-ho who was a confucian sch...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105601020
2018
Korean
810
KCI우수등재
학술저널
339-371(33쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In this paper, we investigated the inward consciousness of Chosun intellectuals about the modern period and Japan at the end of the 19th century by Donghaengilrok(東行日錄), a report of public journey written by Min Geon-ho who was a confucian sch...
In this paper, we investigated the inward consciousness of Chosun intellectuals about the modern period and Japan at the end of the 19th century by Donghaengilrok(東行日錄), a report of public journey written by Min Geon-ho who was a confucian scholar and a government official of Chosun at the same time.
Japans external scenery was praised as a fairyland in the past. After China centric view had been introduced, this scenery was redescribed as a place where ideas and landscapes were separated, whereas this gap has been reduced or disappeared in modern times. First, unlike the Dispatch of the Chosun Envoys to Tokugawa Japan , they observed only modern culture that had been developed by transportation of inter-city network. Although Chosun intellectuals marveled at the speed and convenience of modern culture and attempted to distinguish what they saw from what they heard and to record thoroughly, they only listed superficial observations and factual information without trying to accommodate it or to conduct in-depth analyses. Rather, they showed a passive attitude in Tokyo, either by staying indoors or not documenting the knowledge and experience of Lee Heonyoung in detail. Japan was a country of savages they wanted to avoid, and they showed an attitude toward China centric view about the superficial level of custom such as bathing culture. This negative perception, however, ended up in the level of custom, while they seem to have judged Western culture itself to be indispensable. In other word, Min Geon-hos envoy experiences shows the persistence and cracks of China centric view, and also reveals the ambivalence about Japan.
This consciousness of discomfort was shaped by the longing for their homeland and family, and turned them into activities such as written conversation in Chinese and Literary exchange that allowed them to acquire an identity of Chinese classics and cultural self-esteem, It is highly likely that such behavior was a coping mechanism of consciousness to maintain the identity of Chosun in the modern period, a fancy and convenient but incompletely comprehensible and dreaded environment.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이이화, "신사유람단을 1881년 일본시찰단으로" 역사문제연구소 (73) : 18-22, 2005
2 허경진, "수신사(修信使)에 대한 조선과 일본의 태도 차이" 열상고전연구회 (53) : 29-58, 2016
3 김동철, "동아시아 개항장 도시의 로컬리티" 소명출판 168-203, 2013
4 허동현, "근대한일관계사연구" 국학자료원 2000
5 김기수, "국역 해행총재" 민족문화추진회 1974
6 이헌영, "국역 해행총재" 민족문화추진회 1974
7 한태문, "紳士遊覽團 使行錄에 반영된 한일문화교류 -『日槎集略』과 『東行日錄』을 중심으로-" 대한일어일문학회 (52) : 405-420, 2011
8 민건호, "東行日錄 ; 海隱日錄 1" 釜山近代歷史館 2006
9 송헌빈, "東京日記(규장각 소장, 청구기호: 古 4710-4)"
10 이효정, "朝鮮修信使の来日記録研究 ―もう一つの近代―" ICU 2015
1 이이화, "신사유람단을 1881년 일본시찰단으로" 역사문제연구소 (73) : 18-22, 2005
2 허경진, "수신사(修信使)에 대한 조선과 일본의 태도 차이" 열상고전연구회 (53) : 29-58, 2016
3 김동철, "동아시아 개항장 도시의 로컬리티" 소명출판 168-203, 2013
4 허동현, "근대한일관계사연구" 국학자료원 2000
5 김기수, "국역 해행총재" 민족문화추진회 1974
6 이헌영, "국역 해행총재" 민족문화추진회 1974
7 한태문, "紳士遊覽團 使行錄에 반영된 한일문화교류 -『日槎集略』과 『東行日錄』을 중심으로-" 대한일어일문학회 (52) : 405-420, 2011
8 민건호, "東行日錄 ; 海隱日錄 1" 釜山近代歷史館 2006
9 송헌빈, "東京日記(규장각 소장, 청구기호: 古 4710-4)"
10 이효정, "朝鮮修信使の来日記録研究 ―もう一つの近代―" ICU 2015
11 이효정, "19세기 후반 조사시찰단(朝士視察團)을 통한 지식․문화 교류의 한 양상- 『스에마츠 지로 필담록(末松二郞筆談錄)』을 중심으로" 한국문학회 (78) : 133-164, 2018
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 평가예정 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1998-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.75 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.376 | 0.3 |