청소년의 학업 관련 태도 척도(SAAS-R)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 = Reliability and Validity of School Attitude Assessment Scale-Revised

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was to examine the validity of the School Attitude Assesment Scale-Revised(SAAS-R) using a sample of 334 junior-high school students in metropolitan cities, Korea. Participated students completed the SAAS-R along with measures of one's beliefs about intelligence (i.e., incremental and entity beliefs) and academic achievement. Confirmatory factor analysis mainly supported the five factors representing academic self-perceptions, attitudes toward teachers, attitudes toward school, goal valuation, and motivation/self-regulation. However, six items in the SAAS-R were crossloaded in more than one factor and finally deleted. The final version of the SAAS-R consisted of 29 items, each of which being an indicator for one of five factors. Coefficients of internal consistency varied from .80 to .92 for the five factors. Convergent validity was supported through correlations between the SAAS-R factors and students' beliefs about intelligence and academic achievement. Criterion-related validity was supported by mean differences on the four factors (i.e., academic self-perceptions, attitudes toward teachers, attitudes toward school, goal valuation, and motivation/self-regulation) of the SAAS-R between groups of students with three levels of academic achievement (i.e., high, average, and low) and with two types of one' beliefs about intelligence (i.e., incremental and entity beliefs).

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 McCoach와 Siegle(2003a)의 학업 관련 태도 척도-개정판(School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised: SAAS-R)의 타당도 및 신뢰도를 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 수도권에 거주하고 있는 334명의 중학생들이 SAAS-R척도, 지적능력에 대한 신념 척도 및 학업성적에 대해 응답한 결과를 최종분석에 사용하였다. SAAS-R 척도에 대한 구인 타당도 검증을 위하여 확증적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 5요인(학문적 자기지각, 교사에 대한 태도, 학교에 대한 태도, 목적 가치, 동기/자기조절)이 확인 되었으며, 이들 하위 요인들의 신뢰도(Cronbach의 α=.80～.92)는 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 이 과정에서 SAAS-R 척도의 총 35개 문항들 중 1개 이상의 하위 요인들에 교차부하된 6개 문항들이 최종적으로 삭제되었다. SAAS-R 척도에 대한 수렴 타당도 검증을 위해 상호 상관을 분석한 결과, SAAS-R 척도 중 ‘학교에 대한 태도’ 요인을 제외한 나머지 4개 하위 요인들과 학업성적 및 지적능력에 대한 신념의 하위 요인들 간 유의미한 상호 관련을 맺고 있는 것으로 나타났다. SAAS-R 척도에 대한 준거 관련 타당도 검증을 위해 학업성취 수준에 따른 집단 간 차이 분석 및 지적능력에 대한 신념의 유형에 따른 차이 분석 결과, ‘학교에 대한 태도’ 요인을 제외한 나머지 4개 하위 요인들에서 집단 간 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 토대로 재구성된 학업 관련 태도 척도는 학생들의 학업문제 진단 및 상담을 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 안도희, "학문적 미성취 중학생들의 학업관련 특성: 학업성적, 학업관련 태도, 지적능력에 대한 신념, 학습전략을 중심으로" 한국교육심리학회 21 (21): 723-745, 2007

2 정미경, "학년 및 학업성취 수준에 따른 자기조절학습의 차이분석" 13 (13): 305-332, 1999

3 안도희, "초등학생의 정의적 특성, 학습접근책 및 학업성취와의 관계: 경로모형을 중심으로" 한국교육심리학회 18 (18): 177-197, 2004

4 안도희, "의과 대학생들의 지적능력에 대한 신념을 예측하는 변인 탐색: 인지적·정의적 특성, 부모의 자녀교육관심도 및 가정의 경제적 수준" 한국의학교육학회 20 (20): 219-229, 2008

5 안도희, "대학생의 지적능력에 대한 신념, 목적설정 및 학습접근책간의 관계모형 탐색" 한국교육개발원 32 (32): 3-27, 2005

6 Ahmavaara, A., "effects of selective schooling and self-concept on adolescents' academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck's self-theory" 77 (77): 613-632, 2007

7 Powers, J. D, "Using social environment assets to identify intervention strategies for promoting school success" 27 (27): 177-187, 2005

8 Yumusak, N, "Turkish high school students' biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation" 13 (13): 53-69, 2007

9 Ak, L., "Three different types of elementary school students' school achievements, perceived social support, school attitudes and behavior-adjustment problems" 6 (6): 293-300, 2006

10 McCoach, D. B, "The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve" 63 (63): 414-429, 2003

11 Durik, A. M., "Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis" 98 (98): 382-393, 2006

12 Byrne, B. M, "Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic Concept, applications, and programming" Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

13 Zusho, A, "Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry" 25 (25): 1081-1094, 2003

14 Nota, L, "Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study" 41 (41): 198-215, 2004

15 Trautwein, U, "Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: How the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept" 90 (90): 334-349, 2006

16 Matthews, M. S, "School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program" 51 (51): 167-181, 2007

17 Gottfried, A. E., "Role of parental motivational practices in children's academic intrinsic motivation and achievement" 86 (86): 104-113, 1994

18 Rao, N, "Motivational beliefs study strategies, and mathematics attainment in high and low-achieving chinese secondary school students" 25 (25): 287-316, 2000

19 Howse, R. B., "Motivation and self-regulation as predictors of achievement in economically disadvantaged young children" 71 (71): 151-174, 2003

20 Singh, K, "Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement" 95 (95): 323-332, 2002

21 Esposito,C, "Learning in urban blight: School climate and its effect on the school performance of urban, minority, low-income children" 28 (28): 365-377, 1999

22 Gonida, E., "Implicit theories of intelligence, perceived academic competence, and school achievement: Testing alternative models" 119 (119): 223-238, 2006

23 Blackwell, L. S, "Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention" 78 (78): 246-263, 2007

24 Ommundsen,Y, "Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes" 23 (23): 141-157, 2003

25 Kennett, D. J., "Impact of learned resourcefulness and theories of intelligence on academic achievement of university students: An integrated approach" 26 (26): 441-457, 2006

26 Ee, J, "High-achieving students: Their motivational goals, self-regulation and achievement and relationships to their teachers' goals and strategy-based instruction" 14 (14): 23-39, 2003

27 McCoach, D. B, "Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students" 47 (47): 144-154, 2003

28 Baslanti, U, "Factors related to the underachievement of university students in Turkey" 28 (28): 210-215, 2006

29 Hu, L., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives" 6 (6): 1-55, 1999

30 d'Ailly, H, "Children's autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan" 95 (95): 84-96, 2003

31 Nichols, J. D, "Beliefs of intelligence, knowledge acquisition, and motivational orientation: A comparative analysis of Hispanic/Latino and Anglo youth" 8 (8): 39-48, 2006

32 Sattler, J. M, "Assessment of children: Revised and updated third edition" Jerome M. Sattler Publisher, Inc 1992

33 Dahl, T. I, "Are students' beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies?" 75 (75): 257-273, 2005

34 Suldo, S. M, "An independent investigation of the validity of the school attitude assessment survey-revised" 26 (26): 69-82, 2008

35 Griffith, J, "An empirical examination of a model of social climate in elementary schools" 17 (17): 97-117, 1995

36 Roeser, R. W., "Adolescents' perceptions of middle school: Relation to longitudinal changes in academic and psychological adjustment" 8 (8): 123-158, 1998

37 Ireson, J., "Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools" Learning and Instruction

38 Ommundsen, Y, "Academic self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies" 49 (49): 461-474, 2005

39 McCoach, D. B, "A validation study of the school attitude assessment survey" 35 (35): 66-77, 2002

40 Abu-Hilal,M.M, "A structural model of attitudes towards school subjects, academic aspiration and achievement" 20 (20): 75-84, 2000

41 Suldo, S. M., "A social-cognitive-behavioral model of academic predictors of adolescents' life satisfaction" 23 (23): 56-69, 2008