Koryo-Tripitaka(고려대장경) and Most Woijang(외장) were made in the same times. Therefore, similarly to Koryo- Tripitaka, research on Woijang is actively conducted. Korean researchers argue that they must be evaluated as equal cultural heritage...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104183457
2017
-
900
KCI등재
학술저널
113-138(26쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드Koryo-Tripitaka(고려대장경) and Most Woijang(외장) were made in the same times. Therefore, similarly to Koryo- Tripitaka, research on Woijang is actively conducted. Korean researchers argue that they must be evaluated as equal cultural heritage...
Koryo-Tripitaka(고려대장경) and Most Woijang(외장) were made in the same times. Therefore, similarly to Koryo- Tripitaka, research on Woijang is actively conducted. Korean researchers argue that they must be evaluated as equal cultural heritage. But, the study on Koryo-Trikitaka is active, and there is not a study on Woijang in Japan. The location of much Koryo- Tripitaka is confirmed in Japan. But the location of Woijang was not covered all until now. Therefore I arranged the location of Koryo-Tripitaka and Woijang of the possession in Japan. And I examined Category of Koryo-Tripitaka, Value of Woijang, a problem of the Najeonsuhameumso-Sutra(내전수함음소).
It is as follows when I arrange the result. Koryo-Trikitaka of the possession in Japan is classified in print of the pre-modern (Koryo and Chosen Dynasty) and the print of modern times. Of these, the former does not have Woijang, and it is confirmed in the latter that there is Woijang. In other words the Tripitaka printed in pre-modern can confirm that Woijang was not included in a category of the Tripitaka. Most of Woijang do not belong to Sutra. Vinaya. Abhidharma and belong to the Commentaries. To be exact, a category of the Tripitaka does not contain Woijang.
However, important documents about Hwaom(화엄) and Zen(선) are included in Woijang, and are the documents which are precious in the East Asia Buddhism. Most of Woijang are made at time same as the Koryo-Tripitaka. Therefore, as for those cultural value, the indication to be equality is natural. But, I must judge that it is not a category of the Koryo-Tripitaka when I watch it printed in pre-modern. In addition, in late years a wood blocks of Najeonsuhameumso-Sutra was discovered in Haeinsa(해인사). It has been argued about Najeonsuhameumso-Sutra and relations with Koryo-Tripitaka afterwards. But, this was only attached to the end of a volume of Tashanlitshuliupolo-mitokin(대승리취륙파라밀다경) as a certain meaning implied by variety of the Pronunciation(음의). And it was not settled for more than 500 for Koryo period. In other words a category of the Koryo-Tripitaka does not contain Najeonsuhameumso-Sutra, too.
『고려국신조대장교정별록(高麗國新雕大藏校正別錄)』의 교감(校勘) 유형과 성격