동경재판이 초래한 전후 일본사회 전쟁 책임의식 결여 －A급 전범 면책문제를 중심으로－ = The Lack of War Responsibility resulted from the Tokyo Trial －Focusing on the Immunity of Class-A War Criminals－

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims at finding a way to achieve a historical reconciliation for the East Asian regional peace building process based on a hypothesis that the lack of war responsibility in Japanese society was resulted from issues related to the Tokyo trial and politics surrounding the immunity of class-A war criminals. The Tokyo trial was prejudicial. Its treaty, the appointment of a judge, a presiding judge and a chief prosecutor, and even the change and reduction of court`s rulings, were all possible by the involvement of the General McArthur. Moreover, the Tokyo trial, dominated by western colonial rulers and the General McArthur, could not thoroughly investigate and judge crimes and damage of Asian victim countries. Politically sensitive class-A war criminals and their immunity led to the result that Japanese conservative leaders never let go of their solid imperialism. Most sensitive diplomatic issues infringing the trust-based Northeast Asian peace building are related to the Tokyo trial. For example, the Tokyo trial and its treaty ignored Japans` colonial ruling and refusal to return colonial counties` land, the forcefully demanded abandonment of a war indemnity, and class-A war criminals` Yasukuni Shrine issues. Therefore, for the sake of a historical reconciliation for the Northeast Asia peace, research and discussion should be enhanced to address war responsibility by facing the reality of the Japanese invasion and criticizing politics behind the Tokyo trial and the San Francisco treaty. Northeast Asia can only enjoy universal values-based human rights and human rights-based peace when imperialistic crimes on Asian colonies as well as war crimes are actively discussed and criticized.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 山田朗, "歷史認識問題の原点ㆍ東京裁判" 學習の友社 2008

2 문규석, "한일간 역사현안의 국제법적 조명" 동북아역사재단 2009

3 "추도사"

4 "제22회 국회 본회의 제 43호"

5 다야치카코, "전쟁범죄와 법" 연경문화사 2010

6 홍성필, "일본의 전후책임인식과 이행에 대한 국제법적 평가" 법학연구소 23 (23): 389-432, 2012

7 아카자와 시로, "동경재판과 전쟁책임" (28) : 2006

8 이장희, "도쿄국제군사재판과 뉘른베르크 국제 군사재판에 대한 국제법적 비교 연구" 동북아역사재단 (25) : 195-246, 2009

9 황허이, "도쿄 대재판" 예담 1999

10 吉田裕外, "記憶と認識の中のアジア・太平洋戦争――岩波講座アジア・太平洋戦争" 岩波書店 2015

11 "衆議院議員野田佳彦君提出｢戦犯｣に対する認識と内閣総理大臣の靖国神社参拝に関する質問に対する答弁書"

12 安倍晋三, "美しい國へ" 文藝春秋 2013

13 小堀桂一郞, "東京裁判幻の辯護側資料:却下された日本の辯明" 筑摩書房 2011

14 吉本貞昭, "東京裁判を批判したマッカ-サ-元帥の謎と真実 : GHQの検閲下で報じられた｢東京裁判は誤り｣の真相" ハ-ト出版 2013

15 前坂俊之, "東京裁判はなにを裁いたのか : 判決から60年, 戰犯裁判の全貌に迫る" 新人物往來社 2008

16 原子昭三, "東京裁判の亡靈を擊て : 二十一世紀から見た大東亞戰爭" 展轉社 2007

17 大沼保昭, "東京裁判 戰爭責任 戰後責任" 東信堂 2007

18 日暮吉延, "東京裁判" 講談社 2008

19 "朝日新聞"

20 渡部昇一, "日本は侵略國家だったのか:｢パル判決書｣の眞實" ワック 2012

21 "戰犯の歌"

22 栗屋憲太郞, "戰爭責任·戰後責任:日本とドイツはどう違うか" 朝日新聞社 1994

23 前野徹, "戰後 歷史の眞實:わが愛する孫たちへ傳えたい" 經濟界 2000

24 "戦犯に対する認識と内閣総理大臣の靖国神社参拝に関する質問主意書"

25 "戦傷病者戦没者遺族等援護法"

26 荒井信一, "戦争責任論 : 現代史からの問い" 岩波書店 2005

27 "戦争受刑者の即時釈放要請に関する決議案"

28 "Instrument of Surrender, Signed at Tokyo Bay"