RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개발독재 시대의 윤리와 부(富) : 광주대단지사건의 텍스트들과 ‘이웃사랑’의 문제 = Ethics and Capital in the Age of Developmental Dictatorship : Texts on the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident and the Issue of “Neighborly Love”

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Gwangju Housing Complex Incident was an uprising of residents which occurred in the process of the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s plan to relocate the urban poor to Gwangju, Gyeonggi-do Province (currently Seongnam). Previous studies highlighted the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident as a case through which the right to live and human rights of the urban poor was grossly violated under the governing ideology of the ruling government. This study focuses on the hidden side of the relocation of displaced people and the urban poor’s right to live. In other words, this study examined the facts which paradoxically had to be erased from the text on the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident to put emphasis on the main theme. Although the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident was an altercation surrounding the urban poor’s right to live, it was also a site of fierce speculative investment in real estate, and an epitome of the 1970s. The main agents of the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident were the people, classified in the low-income bracket, who joined the speculative investment market with desires for land and houses, whereas those without properties who did not have the property rights to wield in the first place were excluded for being unqualified, even in the uprising of citizens. In short, behind the fight for the urban poor’s human rights and the right to live were also the inner discrimination between the residents of the grand housing complex, which made the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident into an altercation between conflicting interests. By focusing on the reportages and novels on the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident, this study connects the entities that were erased from the narrative and connected their characteristics with the keyword “petit bourgeois.” This leads to the following question that the Korean literature had to answer in the 1970s, in the aftermath of the frantic eco nomic development which started in the mid- to late 1960s : do “the people” fall into the same category as the petit bourgeois or not? The people and the petit bourgeois were initially distinguished but the identity of the people, which becomes obscure in the face of the equality of desire, becomes a vacuum in the narrative. This study suggests that the question stemmed from the vacuum in the narrative, that is, the question on what being “petit bourgeois” is, leads to the issue of one’s attitude towards one’s “neighbors” in everyday life. The issue at hand, therefore, is “who is one’s neighbors and how can one love them?” This is an important question, because the love towards others is not merely given as a normative virtue, but becomes something that could be likened to a commandment, with self-denial as a cost.
    번역하기

    The Gwangju Housing Complex Incident was an uprising of residents which occurred in the process of the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s plan to relocate the urban poor to Gwangju, Gyeonggi-do Province (currently Seongnam). Previous studies highligh...

    The Gwangju Housing Complex Incident was an uprising of residents which occurred in the process of the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s plan to relocate the urban poor to Gwangju, Gyeonggi-do Province (currently Seongnam). Previous studies highlighted the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident as a case through which the right to live and human rights of the urban poor was grossly violated under the governing ideology of the ruling government. This study focuses on the hidden side of the relocation of displaced people and the urban poor’s right to live. In other words, this study examined the facts which paradoxically had to be erased from the text on the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident to put emphasis on the main theme. Although the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident was an altercation surrounding the urban poor’s right to live, it was also a site of fierce speculative investment in real estate, and an epitome of the 1970s. The main agents of the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident were the people, classified in the low-income bracket, who joined the speculative investment market with desires for land and houses, whereas those without properties who did not have the property rights to wield in the first place were excluded for being unqualified, even in the uprising of citizens. In short, behind the fight for the urban poor’s human rights and the right to live were also the inner discrimination between the residents of the grand housing complex, which made the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident into an altercation between conflicting interests. By focusing on the reportages and novels on the Gwangju Housing Complex Incident, this study connects the entities that were erased from the narrative and connected their characteristics with the keyword “petit bourgeois.” This leads to the following question that the Korean literature had to answer in the 1970s, in the aftermath of the frantic eco nomic development which started in the mid- to late 1960s : do “the people” fall into the same category as the petit bourgeois or not? The people and the petit bourgeois were initially distinguished but the identity of the people, which becomes obscure in the face of the equality of desire, becomes a vacuum in the narrative. This study suggests that the question stemmed from the vacuum in the narrative, that is, the question on what being “petit bourgeois” is, leads to the issue of one’s attitude towards one’s “neighbors” in everyday life. The issue at hand, therefore, is “who is one’s neighbors and how can one love them?” This is an important question, because the love towards others is not merely given as a normative virtue, but becomes something that could be likened to a commandment, with self-denial as a cost.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 송은영, "현대도시 서울의 형성과 1960-70년대 소설의 문화지리학" 연세대학교 대학원 2008

    2 슬라보예 지젝, "폭력이란 무엇인가-폭력에 대한 6가지 삐딱한 성찰" 난장이 2011

    3 박태순, "특별 르포타지-광주단지 4박5일"

    4 정과리, "타인 안에서 나를 살다" (여름) : 1993

    5 신상웅, "창조" 카톨릭청년사 1971

    6 박태순, "정든 땅 언덕 위" 동아출판사 1995

    7 서영채, "인문학 개념정원" 문학동네 2013

    8 케네스 레이너드, "이웃-정치신학에 관한 세 가지 탐구" 도서출판b 2010

    9 신상웅, "이 어두운 날의 미아-신상웅 전집 3" 동서문화사 2003

    10 윤흥길, "아홉 켤레의 구두로 남은 사내" 문학과지성사 1997

    1 송은영, "현대도시 서울의 형성과 1960-70년대 소설의 문화지리학" 연세대학교 대학원 2008

    2 슬라보예 지젝, "폭력이란 무엇인가-폭력에 대한 6가지 삐딱한 성찰" 난장이 2011

    3 박태순, "특별 르포타지-광주단지 4박5일"

    4 정과리, "타인 안에서 나를 살다" (여름) : 1993

    5 신상웅, "창조" 카톨릭청년사 1971

    6 박태순, "정든 땅 언덕 위" 동아출판사 1995

    7 서영채, "인문학 개념정원" 문학동네 2013

    8 케네스 레이너드, "이웃-정치신학에 관한 세 가지 탐구" 도서출판b 2010

    9 신상웅, "이 어두운 날의 미아-신상웅 전집 3" 동서문화사 2003

    10 윤흥길, "아홉 켤레의 구두로 남은 사내" 문학과지성사 1997

    11 백낙청, "시민문학론" 4 (4): 1969

    12 이문열, "변경" 문학과지성사 1998

    13 전상기, "문화적 -주체의 구성과 소시민 의식-" 상허학회 13 : 477-506, 2004

    14 김현, "문학과 유토피아" 문학과지성사 1980

    15 박태순, "무너지는 산" 1972

    16 손정목, "도시50년사-광주대단지 사건" 38 : 2003

    17 조세희, "난장이가 쏘아올린 작은 공" 문학과지성사 1997

    18 김주연, "김주연 평론문학선" 문학사상사 1992

    19 플라톤, "국가" 서광사 2005

    20 강진구, "광주대단지 사건과 문학적 재현" 중앙어문학회 64 : 205-238, 2015

    21 강은교, "‘나’, 처음으로 털어놓은 문제작가 10인의 자전소설" 청람문화사 1978

    22 이현석, "4.19혁명과 60년대 말 문학담론에 나타난 비-정치의 감각과 논리" 한국현대문학회 (35) : 223-254, 2011

    23 김원, "1971년 광주 대단지 사건 연구 도시 봉기와 도시하층민" 한국민주주의연구소 (18) : 196-231, 2008

    24 김동춘, "1971년 8‧10 광주대단지 주민항거의 배경과 성격" 한국공간환경학회 21 (21): 5-33, 2011

    25 박숙자, "1970년대 타자의 윤리학과 ‘공감’의 서사" 대중서사학회 (25) : 181-203, 2011

    26 김경민, "1970년대 소설에 형상화된 시민성 연구" 국어국문학회 (169) : 145-166, 2014

    27 박홍근, "1960년대 후반서울 도시근대화의 성격 - 도시빈민의 추방과 중산층 도시로의 공간재편 -" 5.18연구소 15 (15): 237-276, 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 () KCI등재후보
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 0.9
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.86 0.87 1.721 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼