노동개혁을 위한 노동법의 과제 = 근로시간ㆍ해고ㆍ취업규칙의 개정론을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Korean government has driven labour reform seriously since the summer of 2015. Social Great Agreement among labor, management and government (hereafter Social Agreement) was achieved on September, 15. The next day, Saenuri Party, the ruling party, proposed five drafts for amending labour laws.
This paper aims to review the five proposals for labour reforms critically. To achieve this goal, I examine the draft for refining working time law, the attempt to weaken dismissal regulation and the plan to ease work rule system.
According to the amendment for working time law, overtime work will include the time of rest day working, shortening the maximum of working time in a week to 52 hours. The current law, however, already provide that the maximum of working time is 52 hours, so that the amendment starts from the wrong premise. In order to shorten working time, first of all, daily rest time should be required no less than 11 hours.
Korean government tries to revise the law or to make a guideline concerning as dismissal for low-performance workers. The current level of employment security in Korea is approximately 60% of the average of OECD countries. That is to say, it is not a time to make the dismissal law more flexible. We should note that the weakening the dismissal law would bring more disadvantages than advantages. It is very dangerous that the principle of just dismissal is slipped down.
The governments plan to ease work rule system is not correct. It is desirable that workers and managers can make or change the system together as the international labour standards or the most of OECD countries.
To succeed the reform, the Government and the Assembly have to keep in mind that more important thing is in details than general agreement.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 황덕순, "｢사회안전망 강화를 위한 사회보장법의 과제" 한국사회보장법학회 2015

2 조용만, "헌법 제32조와 일반해고"

3 권오성, "행정지침에 의한 근로조건 규율의 문제점, 9.15 노사정 대타협과 법적쟁점" 2015

4 조용만, "프랑스에서 ‘개인적 사유에 의한 해고’의 실체적 제한에 관한 법리 - 직무능력부족, 실적불량을 이유로 하는 해고를 중심으로 -" 한국노동법학회 (55) : 249-298, 2015

5 노호창, "지침 등에 의한 개별적 근로관계 규율의 문제점 검토, 노동법, 지침과예규를 넘어"

6 박제성, "장시간노동과 노동시간단축(II)" 한국노동연구원 2011

7 배규식, "장시간노동과 노동시간단축(I)" 한국노동연구원 2011

8 고용노동부, "노사정 대타협의 주요 내용과 향후 추진 방향" 2015

9 김선수, "노동부 행정지침의 한계와 통제, 노동법, 지침과 예규를 넘어"

10 이승욱, "근로기준법상 서면합의의 효력" 서울대노동법연구회 (7) : 1998

11 도재형, "근로기준법상 근로자대표 및 서면 합의 제도" 한국노동법학회 (37) : 87-122, 2011

12 하갑래, "근로기준법(전면개정 제21판)" (주) 중앙경제 2009

13 하갑래, "근로기준법" 중앙경제 2015

14 "THE LABOUR MARKET IN KOREA: ENHANCING FLEXIBILITY AND RAISING PARTICIPATION"

15 강성태, "OECD 고용보호지수의 정확성과 적정성" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (34) : 321-354, 2013

16 "Employment Outlook"