RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      새 자료를 통해본 다산의 문답형 제자 강학 = A study on the Tasan`s interrogatory method of teaching by newly found materials

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100399507

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper examines the nature and results of the question and answer pedagogy employed by Tasan Chong Yag-yong(1762~1836) in educating his students in debate during the period of his exile to Kangjin (1801~ 1818). As a pedagogical method, debate proceeds from question and answer to argument in order to construct a two-way process of education in which both teacher and student are invested. In Tasan’s case, the entire process of his sustained interrogation of students, along with their replies, was recorded. Upon investigating these records further, we find that Tasan emphasized this dialogic pedagogy in order to meld his scholarly inquiry with his educational activities. We find in the Yoyudang chonso [Revised Complete Works of the Yo yudang] four types of these dialogic pedagogical materials, along with one type in the Sohak chugwan mundap [Dialogues on Stringing the Pearls of the Elementary Learning]. Indeed, this question and answer pedagogy was the most heavily emphasized portion of Tasan’s introductory course of study, as the process of working through these multilayered and complex problems together proved to be a highly efficient educational practice. Tasan would first ask his students to question him on difficult points or matters that they were having trouble thinking through, and in answering them would reevaluate his own argumentation while at once increasing student comprehension. After completing his Sohak chugwan [Stringing the Pearls of the Elementary Learning] - a textbook on the Sohak [Elementary Learning] - Tasan instructed his student Yun Chong-sam to scrutinize the work and produce a set of questions; his answers to these he compiled in the Sohak chugwan mundap [Dialogues on Stringing the Pearls of the Elementary Learning]. These dialogues took the content of the textbook one step further while at the same time functioning as a useful supplementary text. They also serve as an example of Tasan’s active and highly motivated educational program, within which his question and answer pedagogy held an important place. His Choryo mundap [Dialogues on the Extracted Essentials] was another example - it was Tasan’s carefully planned division and assignment to his students of parts of the Sang’ui choryo [Extracted Essentials of Funerary Ceremonies] that he was compiling that gave rise to the work. In taking part in this question and answer learning, questioners were not simply passive learners, but rather, active collaborators in research and scholarship. In ensuring that even a single question could develop into a discourse, questioners trained in the proper modes of scholarship and inquiry. Moreover, in the process of their teacher’s working to provide clearly reasoned answers that both drew upon textual authority and cleared up doubts, students acquired sophisticated scholarly skill and know-how. Tasan’s dialogic pedagogy proved an efficient means of cultivating students’ abilities to solve problems through debate and argument while at once inviting them to come to conclusions of their own. According to the needs of the student or problem at hand, Tasan made use of not just written and oral debate, but also debates pitting one student against either a single peer or even an entire group. No matter what the case, however, study was always a two-way process. In this way, students improved in their abilities both to pose questions and to grapple with them. They gained facility with scholarly methodology while at once cementing the foundations of their own learning.
      번역하기

      This paper examines the nature and results of the question and answer pedagogy employed by Tasan Chong Yag-yong(1762~1836) in educating his students in debate during the period of his exile to Kangjin (1801~ 1818). As a pedagogical method, debate ...

      This paper examines the nature and results of the question and answer pedagogy employed by Tasan Chong Yag-yong(1762~1836) in educating his students in debate during the period of his exile to Kangjin (1801~ 1818). As a pedagogical method, debate proceeds from question and answer to argument in order to construct a two-way process of education in which both teacher and student are invested. In Tasan’s case, the entire process of his sustained interrogation of students, along with their replies, was recorded. Upon investigating these records further, we find that Tasan emphasized this dialogic pedagogy in order to meld his scholarly inquiry with his educational activities. We find in the Yoyudang chonso [Revised Complete Works of the Yo yudang] four types of these dialogic pedagogical materials, along with one type in the Sohak chugwan mundap [Dialogues on Stringing the Pearls of the Elementary Learning]. Indeed, this question and answer pedagogy was the most heavily emphasized portion of Tasan’s introductory course of study, as the process of working through these multilayered and complex problems together proved to be a highly efficient educational practice. Tasan would first ask his students to question him on difficult points or matters that they were having trouble thinking through, and in answering them would reevaluate his own argumentation while at once increasing student comprehension. After completing his Sohak chugwan [Stringing the Pearls of the Elementary Learning] - a textbook on the Sohak [Elementary Learning] - Tasan instructed his student Yun Chong-sam to scrutinize the work and produce a set of questions; his answers to these he compiled in the Sohak chugwan mundap [Dialogues on Stringing the Pearls of the Elementary Learning]. These dialogues took the content of the textbook one step further while at the same time functioning as a useful supplementary text. They also serve as an example of Tasan’s active and highly motivated educational program, within which his question and answer pedagogy held an important place. His Choryo mundap [Dialogues on the Extracted Essentials] was another example - it was Tasan’s carefully planned division and assignment to his students of parts of the Sang’ui choryo [Extracted Essentials of Funerary Ceremonies] that he was compiling that gave rise to the work. In taking part in this question and answer learning, questioners were not simply passive learners, but rather, active collaborators in research and scholarship. In ensuring that even a single question could develop into a discourse, questioners trained in the proper modes of scholarship and inquiry. Moreover, in the process of their teacher’s working to provide clearly reasoned answers that both drew upon textual authority and cleared up doubts, students acquired sophisticated scholarly skill and know-how. Tasan’s dialogic pedagogy proved an efficient means of cultivating students’ abilities to solve problems through debate and argument while at once inviting them to come to conclusions of their own. According to the needs of the student or problem at hand, Tasan made use of not just written and oral debate, but also debates pitting one student against either a single peer or even an entire group. No matter what the case, however, study was always a two-way process. In this way, students improved in their abilities both to pose questions and to grapple with them. They gained facility with scholarly methodology while at once cementing the foundations of their own learning.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 윤종삼, "춘각집(春閣集) 권11 중 소학주관문답(小學珠串問答)"

      2 다산학술문화재단, "정본여유당전서" 다산학술문화재단 2012

      3 박종천, "정본 여유당전서, 제22책" 다산학술문화재단 2012

      4 정민, "우둔하고 졸렬해야 한다 - 기어 자굉에게 준 다산의 증언첩" (가을) : 74-81, 2011

      5 임형택, "실사구시의 한국학" 창작과비평사 399-434, 2000

      6 정약용, "승암예문(僧菴禮問), 필사본"

      7 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원, "다산학단 문헌집성 전9책" 2008

      8 강진군, "다산정약용선생 유물특별전 도록(1-5)" 2010

      9 정민, "다산이 승려에게 준 증언첩(贈言帖)과 교학 방식" 한국실학학회 (27) : 231-257, 2014

      10 정민, "다산의 재발견" 휴머니스트 출판그룹 2011

      1 윤종삼, "춘각집(春閣集) 권11 중 소학주관문답(小學珠串問答)"

      2 다산학술문화재단, "정본여유당전서" 다산학술문화재단 2012

      3 박종천, "정본 여유당전서, 제22책" 다산학술문화재단 2012

      4 정민, "우둔하고 졸렬해야 한다 - 기어 자굉에게 준 다산의 증언첩" (가을) : 74-81, 2011

      5 임형택, "실사구시의 한국학" 창작과비평사 399-434, 2000

      6 정약용, "승암예문(僧菴禮問), 필사본"

      7 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원, "다산학단 문헌집성 전9책" 2008

      8 강진군, "다산정약용선생 유물특별전 도록(1-5)" 2010

      9 정민, "다산이 승려에게 준 증언첩(贈言帖)과 교학 방식" 한국실학학회 (27) : 231-257, 2014

      10 정민, "다산의 재발견" 휴머니스트 출판그룹 2011

      11 정민, "다산의 재발견" 휴머니스트 출판그룹 53-98, 2011

      12 정민, "다산의 선문답-순암, 의순, 법훈, 자굉 스님과 강학" (여름) : 98-105, 2011

      13 정민, "다산의 선문답" (겨울) : 13-31, 2008

      14 정약용, "다산시문집" 솔 1986

      15 정민, "다산선생지식경영법" 김영사 2006

      16 정민, "다산 逸文을 통해본 승려와의 교유와 강학" 한국한문학회 (50) : 101-127, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-10-30 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Society for Korean Literature in Classical Chinese KCI등재
      2017-10-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Korean literature in Hanmun -> Journal of Korean Literature in Classical Chinese KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.77 0.77 0.79
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.9 0.86 1.77 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼