RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    발전사관을 넘어 국문학 연구를 생각한다 = Thinking of Korean Literature Research beyond the Developmental View of History

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100399496

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Claims that the internal modernization of this country brought the development of Korean literature are not true. They were just made by requests from nationalism after the beginning of the 20th century. The asserted spontaneous modernization of Korean literature has been a logic that implicitly but naturally justifies the capitalist modern times. But actually, those times that we reached is not a utopia, but a hell of fire. Thus, the developmental view of history which is embedded within the theory of the internal development of Korean literature should be fully reviewed and criticized. This suggests it’s unreasonable to unconditionally ignore the pre-modern times from the perspective of the modern times. Literature of the pre-modern times should be treated as meaningful within the contexts of the same period. The pre-modern times needs to be considered as the storage of speculations which are required for transition to the capitalist modern times rather than as what has to be overcome or abolished. Here, importantly, works of pre-modern literature would be able to support that consideration. Of course, this should not be construed approving all aspects of the pre-modern times.
    번역하기

    Claims that the internal modernization of this country brought the development of Korean literature are not true. They were just made by requests from nationalism after the beginning of the 20th century. The asserted spontaneous modernization of Korea...

    Claims that the internal modernization of this country brought the development of Korean literature are not true. They were just made by requests from nationalism after the beginning of the 20th century. The asserted spontaneous modernization of Korean literature has been a logic that implicitly but naturally justifies the capitalist modern times. But actually, those times that we reached is not a utopia, but a hell of fire. Thus, the developmental view of history which is embedded within the theory of the internal development of Korean literature should be fully reviewed and criticized. This suggests it’s unreasonable to unconditionally ignore the pre-modern times from the perspective of the modern times. Literature of the pre-modern times should be treated as meaningful within the contexts of the same period. The pre-modern times needs to be considered as the storage of speculations which are required for transition to the capitalist modern times rather than as what has to be overcome or abolished. Here, importantly, works of pre-modern literature would be able to support that consideration. Of course, this should not be construed approving all aspects of the pre-modern times.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼