RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    탈 냉전기 미국의 대 중앙아시아 정책과 함의: 구조적 현실주의 관점에서 = The American policy and the implication for Central Asia in the Post-Cold war Era: With Structural Realism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100099593

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes the US’s policy towards Central Asia from the perspective of the neo-realist system theory which states that the international system is likely to decide and hold influence over an individual state’s foreign policy. It can be said that a uni-polar system has been established since the collapse of the Cold War across the world; particularly in Central Asia where the multi-polar system was formed. Over the last two decades the US policy towards Central Asia have shown some clear changes towards the US’s gradual acceptance of the multi-polarity in the region even though it started from the uni-polarity and unilateralism. This change resulted from the US recognizing that her superiority is no more effective in protecting its security from terrorism and radicalism in the region, thus there’s no other way but approving Russia and China’s role in the region in order to seek cost sharing for maintaining stability. As US’s cost for cooperation with Central Asian states has been increasing under the multipolar system in the region, US’s Central Asian policy is paying more attention to cooperation with Russia and China rather than in competition with them. With the 2014 withdrawal of US troops in Afghanistan the US’s retreat could bring insecurity to Central Asia.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes the US’s policy towards Central Asia from the perspective of the neo-realist system theory which states that the international system is likely to decide and hold influence over an individual state’s foreign policy. It can be s...

    This paper analyzes the US’s policy towards Central Asia from the perspective of the neo-realist system theory which states that the international system is likely to decide and hold influence over an individual state’s foreign policy. It can be said that a uni-polar system has been established since the collapse of the Cold War across the world; particularly in Central Asia where the multi-polar system was formed. Over the last two decades the US policy towards Central Asia have shown some clear changes towards the US’s gradual acceptance of the multi-polarity in the region even though it started from the uni-polarity and unilateralism. This change resulted from the US recognizing that her superiority is no more effective in protecting its security from terrorism and radicalism in the region, thus there’s no other way but approving Russia and China’s role in the region in order to seek cost sharing for maintaining stability. As US’s cost for cooperation with Central Asian states has been increasing under the multipolar system in the region, US’s Central Asian policy is paying more attention to cooperation with Russia and China rather than in competition with them. With the 2014 withdrawal of US troops in Afghanistan the US’s retreat could bring insecurity to Central Asia.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박상남, "현대 중앙아시아" 한신대학교 출판부 2010

    2 한석희, "중국의 다극화전략, 다자주의외교, 그리고 동북아시아 안보" 국제지역연구센터 11 (11): 349-374, 2007

    3 "조선일보"

    4 박상남, "신 현실주의 ‘체계이론’ 관점에서 본 러시아-중앙아시아 관계 -정치, 안보, 경제공동체 건설을 중심으로-" 국제지역연구센터 16 (16): 53-76, 2013

    5 문수언, "상하이협력기구(SCO)를 통하여 본 러시아와 중국 관계: 러시아의 우려와 대응" 사회과학연구소 13 (13): 1-33, 2011

    6 박상남, "미국의 선택과 중앙아시아"

    7 케네스 월츠, "국제정치이론" 사회평론 2004

    8 Kuchins, Andrew C., "Why Washington Needs to Integrate the New Silk Road with the Pivot to Asia" The National Bureau of Asian Research (16) : 2013

    9 Blake Jr, Robert O., "U.S. Policy in Central Asia"

    10 Cooley, Alexander, "U. S. Bases and Democratization in Central Asia" 52 (52): 2008

    1 박상남, "현대 중앙아시아" 한신대학교 출판부 2010

    2 한석희, "중국의 다극화전략, 다자주의외교, 그리고 동북아시아 안보" 국제지역연구센터 11 (11): 349-374, 2007

    3 "조선일보"

    4 박상남, "신 현실주의 ‘체계이론’ 관점에서 본 러시아-중앙아시아 관계 -정치, 안보, 경제공동체 건설을 중심으로-" 국제지역연구센터 16 (16): 53-76, 2013

    5 문수언, "상하이협력기구(SCO)를 통하여 본 러시아와 중국 관계: 러시아의 우려와 대응" 사회과학연구소 13 (13): 1-33, 2011

    6 박상남, "미국의 선택과 중앙아시아"

    7 케네스 월츠, "국제정치이론" 사회평론 2004

    8 Kuchins, Andrew C., "Why Washington Needs to Integrate the New Silk Road with the Pivot to Asia" The National Bureau of Asian Research (16) : 2013

    9 Blake Jr, Robert O., "U.S. Policy in Central Asia"

    10 Cooley, Alexander, "U. S. Bases and Democratization in Central Asia" 52 (52): 2008

    11 Mankoff, Jeffrey, "The United States and Central Asia after 2014" 2013

    12 Blank, Stephen. J., "The Strategic importance of Central Asia: An American View" Parameters 2008

    13 Azarkan, Ezeli, "The Relations between Central Asian States and United States, China and Russian within the Framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization" 8 (8): 2009

    14 Blank, Stephen, "Russo-Chinese relations at a crossroads: An American view" Russia-China relations: Current state, alternative futures, and implications for the West 2011

    15 Troitsky, Mikhail, "Russian-american relations: upon resetting"

    16 Katz, Mark, "Russia, Iran, and Central Asia: Impact of the U.S. Withdrawal from Afghanistan" Elliot School of International Affairs 2013

    17 Stevenson, Anne, "Recommendations for a Prosperous Post-2014 Afghanistan"

    18 Walter Russell Mead, "Power, Terror, Peace, and War: America’s Grand Strategy in a World at Risk" Knopf 2004

    19 Deutsch, Karl W., "Multipolar Power System and International Stability" 16 (16): 1964

    20 Eurasianet, "Kyrgyzstan: US Armed Forces to Remain at Air Base for Afghan Resupply Operations"

    21 Brletich, Samantha, "Kyrgyzstan after the closure of Manas Transit Center"

    22 Juraev, Shairbek, "Kyrgyz Democracy : The Tulip Revolution and Beyond" 27 (27): 2008

    23 Malashenko, Aleksei, "Islam and Politics in Central Asian States"

    24 Atlantic Council, "Envisioning 2030: U.S. Strategy for a Post-Western World" Atlantic Council 2012

    25 Council on Foreign Relations, "Declaration of the Istanbul Process on Regional Security and Cooperation for a Secure and Stable Afghanistan"

    26 Huasheng, Zhao, "Chinese Views of Post-2014 Afghanistan" (17) : 2014

    27 Sunzhao, "China-Central Asia Trade Seeing Fast Growth"

    28 Nichol, Jim, "Central Asia’s new States: Political Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests" 2003

    29 Peyrouse, Sebastien, "Central Asian Security Trends: views from Europe and Russia" Strategic Studies Institute 2011

    30 Nichol, Jim, "Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests" 2014

    31 Ziegler, Charles E., "Central Asia, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and American Foreign Policy From Indifference to Engagement" 53 (53): 2013

    32 "Atlantic-community"

    33 Maynes, Chales Williams, "America Discovers Central Asia" 82 (82): 2003

    34 김재관, "21세기 미국의 재균형전략과 북중러 삼각관계에 대한 고찰" 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 28 (28): 6-42, 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2009-06-30 학회명변경 한글명 : 동북아연구소 -> 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소
    2009-06-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 통일문제연구소 -> 동북아연구소
    영문명 : The Institute of National Unification -> The Institute for Northeast Asia Research
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.36 0.36 0.36
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.32 0.35 0.605 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼